SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
Just for a bit of fun,I have scanned an article published in Amateur Photographer in 2000, comparing,the Zorki 4,Fed 4, and Kiev 4(although the article confuses by referring to a Kiev 5--the research was obviously lacking)
As usual the article is rather dismissive,don't think too badly of the Author,he is now the Editor of the magazine!
I am not sure if the files are too big,and may need to send in separate posts.
Brian.
As usual the article is rather dismissive,don't think too badly of the Author,he is now the Editor of the magazine!
I am not sure if the files are too big,and may need to send in separate posts.
Brian.
Attachments
pedro.m.reis
Newbie but eager to learn
Hi Brian.
I cant read anything on the pics
Could you sent to my email a larger version?
Thanks
I cant read anything on the pics
Could you sent to my email a larger version?
Thanks
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
Hi Pedro,
I have zoom symbol --bottom right on each pic,which brings them up to full size.Let me know if that works.
Brian.
I have zoom symbol --bottom right on each pic,which brings them up to full size.Let me know if that works.
Brian.
Spyderman
Well-known
interesting reading... thanks for sharing 
Dave Wilkinson
Veteran
Text breaks up on my screen, Brian.
Dave.
Dave.
jamiewakeham
Long time lurker
Oh, Damien Demolder. Good writer but so flippant about anything that's not the latest Nikon/Canon DSLR. Surely it wouldn't have been had to find three FSU cameras that weren't in desperate need of CLA for his test?
Mind you, this is the guy who, a few years back, told a reader who'd written in saying he'd bought something called a 'Leica M3' at a boot sale that it was almost certainly a fake soviet camera and thus worth a tenner or so. D'oh.
Jamie
Mind you, this is the guy who, a few years back, told a reader who'd written in saying he'd bought something called a 'Leica M3' at a boot sale that it was almost certainly a fake soviet camera and thus worth a tenner or so. D'oh.
Jamie
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
Hi Pedro/Dave,
No problem,I'll email the pages over to you shortly.
Cheers,
Brian.
PS.Dave---recently discovered Kiev's, via Kiev 4 --- v.nice!!
No problem,I'll email the pages over to you shortly.
Cheers,
Brian.
PS.Dave---recently discovered Kiev's, via Kiev 4 --- v.nice!!
tyrone.s
Well-known
Thanks for posting those scans. It was really great to be able to read them. You know, reading them reminds me of how lucky we all are to have 'the Internet'. At least these days we can quickly search for a diversity of opinions and indeed get a wider view of any particular subject area - certainly wider than 1 author in 1 magazine. Even though the article was published in 2000 it could have been written in 1985 the way it reads.
Superbus_
Established
Thank you sharing with us this article.
I think the author of this article was a real simple guy with very limited knowledge of the wolrd (I'm not speaking about photography).
The first part of the article is something like that: hey, look at this these soviet boys and girls, they are wearing real clothes living in real houses and yes, they have cameras! and the cameras can take pictures!! wow, amazing!
I think anybody with elementary knowledge about the world and history has to know that the soviet industrial system and soviet (russian, ukrainaian etc.) engineers could do anything from nuclear bomb to cameras, from bicycles to cars etc. and the optical devices were very close to the western standards.
I think the author of this article was a real simple guy with very limited knowledge of the wolrd (I'm not speaking about photography).
The first part of the article is something like that: hey, look at this these soviet boys and girls, they are wearing real clothes living in real houses and yes, they have cameras! and the cameras can take pictures!! wow, amazing!
I think anybody with elementary knowledge about the world and history has to know that the soviet industrial system and soviet (russian, ukrainaian etc.) engineers could do anything from nuclear bomb to cameras, from bicycles to cars etc. and the optical devices were very close to the western standards.
Matthew Allen
Well-known
Thanks for posting that, but where's the end of the article?
There was a rather less dismissive piece on FEDs in a more recent AP. It gave a detailed history of FED models and evolution, and actually talked seriously about using the cameras. I think it was one of those "classics to use" articles.
Matthew
There was a rather less dismissive piece on FEDs in a more recent AP. It gave a detailed history of FED models and evolution, and actually talked seriously about using the cameras. I think it was one of those "classics to use" articles.
Matthew
Spyderman
Well-known
The rest of the article is here: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43107
and here:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43016
BTW Brian - you could have posted it in 3 posts in the same thread...
and here:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43016
BTW Brian - you could have posted it in 3 posts in the same thread...
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
Spyderman said:The rest of the article is here: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43107
and here:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43016
BTW Brian - you could have posted it in 3 posts in the same thread...
Thanks for the tip Ondrej --- unfortunately I am no technophile.In fact just repeated the process with the Kiev article
Cheers,
Brian.
SCOTFORTHLAD
Slow learner,but keen!
Following on from my reposting of the Amateur Photographer Kiev article,here is another which compares a Fed/Zorki,and a Kiev.
More pages to follow.
Cheers,
Brian.
More pages to follow.
Cheers,
Brian.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.