Hi,
Doctor Zero said:
1. Yes the camera would be used, all the protective tape would come off, bring on the scratches! I have never molly-cuddled a camera.
In that case, I wouldn't get a new camera in the first place. The MP is an M6 with a slightly better finder. Your MP looks pretty conventional. Get a chrome M6, have someone do a CLA, upgrade the finder and put an old-style wind lever on it. If you insist on custom leathering, buy some from CameraLeather and have the CLA man install it. After that, you've for all practical purposes got exactly the same camera as in your à-la-carte example configuration, for a fraction of the money. If you don't molly-cuddle cameras, the new MP will represent no added user value.
Doctor Zero said:
3. I am amused, though, because there was another thread not too long ago stating that the MP is about the best camera there is. Unreserved praise.
Well, show me any opinion and I'll show you a thread somewhere on the Internet that supports it.
Doctor Zero said:
5. My main hesitancy is because it *is* a lot of money! And I blame my dad for this attitude. He taught me to not spend much money without making sure it truly is worth it.
Your dad is a wise man.
Doctor Zero said:
8. Buying an M6/4 also allows me to buy a Leica 21 mm new - I like the VC, but since using my dad's Biogon 21 on his Contax G2 - wow! That's something else.
If you were impressed by the Biogon on the G2, get a Biogon 21/2.8 for whatever camera you'll buy. $887 at Popflash, vs. $3197 for a Leica 21/2.8, and there is no agreement on whether the Leica lens is better at all (and it probably isn't
3.6 times better then). Not worth paying an extra $2300 in my book - I guess your dad would agree
🙂
Doctor Zero said:
9. Lastly, the heir loom approach had occurred to me. It's a great camera in my lifetime, and a nice paperweight for future generations.
There's two things to heirlooms, an emotional and a monetary value.
From an investment point of view, future generations are unlikely to have much gain from having a nice camera left to them, unless it's a rare camera in pristine shape. You say yourself that you like to use a camera and don't mind scratches; that, in my opinion, practically excludes the investment argument. If you are ready to spend extra money on a Leica because you think future generations might use the money, put the money in a savings account, an education fund or something similar, they'll have much more use for that.
From an emotional point of view, whether future generations appreciate a camera depends much on their attitude to photography, and on their view on how this particular camera was an important item in your life. That's highly dependent on their individual character as well. If they aren't even born yet, that will be very difficult to assess.
And by the way, congratulations on getting married
🙂 My wife gave me her FED-5B as a wedding gift, which was her father's before her. No monetary value at all, but the emotional value is certainly there. If I have to sell all of my photographic gear, the FED will be the last thing I hold on to.
Philipp