wwulfsohn
Member
What is your recommendation for the best m8 portrait lens for head and shoulder shots? I like a sharp face with lots of bokeh around the edges.
mfogiel
Veteran
The best portrait lens you will get is the C Sonnar 50/1.5 - just read carefully the question about the focus shift. You can see some shots here:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/86731438@N00/pool/tags/ZeissCSonnar50mmf1.5
http://www.flickr.com/groups/86731438@N00/pool/tags/ZeissCSonnar50mmf1.5
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
That sonar is a neat lens. But my preference is the 75 lux. Though if you want more unforgiving sharpness, I suspect there will be those who suggest the 75 cron.
Hacker
黑客
My choice would either be the 50 Lux ASPH and the 75AA.
boilerdoc2
Well-known
75 Lux or cron. Can always soften an image in post.
Steve
Steve
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
The 75 Lux is a very nice specimen indeed.
I was also looking back through shots I took with the Elmarit 90/2.8, another nice lens and a lot more reasonably priced then the lux.
I was also looking back through shots I took with the Elmarit 90/2.8, another nice lens and a lot more reasonably priced then the lux.
Philippe D.
Cheeeeeese
For womens portrait: Lux 75
or Summar 5cm, then you'll make a lot of girl friends
For mens portrait: Cron 90AA
or Summar 5cm, then you'll make a lot of girl friends
For mens portrait: Cron 90AA
bob cole
Well-known
wwulfsohn said:
-----------------------------------------------------
When the Japanese were big buyers a few years ago, this antique was a big seller at astronomical prices...The price has since come down a lot but remains a great portrait lens from the past:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/summicron/104237812/
JWW
Established
75 lux is a great lens. Great bokeh wide open. Lens DOF than Noctilux and good focal length for head shots.
Jan
Jan
S
StuartR
Guest
The 75 lux is one of the nicest lenses ever made, but I must admit that I prefer it on a film M. I like to get a little closer and the cropped sensor makes that a bit harder. A 50mm summilux of any vintage will do the trick. The ASPH will be sharper, but the pre-asph is still lovely and sharp...probably closer to the 75 lux in character.
S
StuartR
Guest
Might as well add some pictures...
75 lux
Pre ASPH lux
Sorry, I have posted these before a few times here and/or elsewhere. They are just the only real examples I have uploaded of these two lenses for portraiture. I tend to use medium format cameras for portraiture and the M8 for street/candids etc.
Oh, here is one more though...75 lux again. A profile though...
75 lux
Pre ASPH lux
Sorry, I have posted these before a few times here and/or elsewhere. They are just the only real examples I have uploaded of these two lenses for portraiture. I tend to use medium format cameras for portraiture and the M8 for street/candids etc.
Oh, here is one more though...75 lux again. A profile though...
S
StuartR
Guest
Keep in mind that shorter lenses can be good too...
35mm Lux ASPH
Again, 35mm lux asph
35mm Lux ASPH
Again, 35mm lux asph
kenn
Ken Nickerson
Best Lens for Portrait
Best Lens for Portrait
If money is not a problem, look at the Noctilux 50mm f/1. It's heavy, somewhat ugly, insanely expensive but renders such beautiful shots they'll make you forget all about that.
http://www.leica-camera.us/photography/m_system/lenses/465.html
Best Lens for Portrait
wwulfsohn said:
If money is not a problem, look at the Noctilux 50mm f/1. It's heavy, somewhat ugly, insanely expensive but renders such beautiful shots they'll make you forget all about that.
http://www.leica-camera.us/photography/m_system/lenses/465.html
S
StuartR
Guest
Perhaps I am alone on this, but I don't think the noctilux is a good choice. It is only a stop faster than the summilux, and twice the weight and cost. It only focuses to 1m, so the .7m of the later summiluxes actually allow them to have less depth of field. Other than at f/1, the summilux is better at every aperture. You are better off just using the summilux and underexposing one stop...particularly if you are using digital. The special "look" it gives is not much different from the summilux pre-asph in my mind. Furthermore, it is only at f/1 in the dead center of the frame. It vignettes quite a large amount, so while it may be f/1 in the center, it is an f/2 in the corners. While some people swear by it, I think it is probably the least practical 50mm lens in the Leica lineup.
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
I had a choice between keeping my noctilux (at $2,700 through the M8 30 percent discount) or my 75 lux. (by choice, I mean that I told myself that I would only keep one).
It really was no contest in my mind. I just think I'll find a lot more uses for the lux over the years.
Heck, for the money I'd rather pair a 35 nokton with a 75 lux - at least on an M8.
It really was no contest in my mind. I just think I'll find a lot more uses for the lux over the years.
Heck, for the money I'd rather pair a 35 nokton with a 75 lux - at least on an M8.
Huwge
Newbie
75 Summarit is shaping up quite nicely, 'lux is nice but the lighter weight Summarit is quite useful at slower speeds and the IQ is not too shabby.
I too find the 35 'lux works well as a portrait lens on the M8 and the 24 can deliver quite pleasing results if you don't mind getting close
I too find the 35 'lux works well as a portrait lens on the M8 and the 24 can deliver quite pleasing results if you don't mind getting close
rwchisholm
Established
pphuang
brain drain...
tbarker13 said:
And I was more than happy to take the noctilux off of Tim's hands (Thanks Tim!!
)I think the 50 FL can work well for portraits. I do prefer the 50 lux to the nocti for portraits, and I also wish that you could get in a bit closer with the nocti, but the nocti does have its own unique signature...
Here are some examples shot with portra 160 vc
Lux 50 1.4
Noctilux
Marc-A.
I Shoot Film
Best Portrait Lens?
First, which best focal lenght? As Stuart said, short lenses can be good (btw wonderful portraits, Stuart). Personnally, I like 50mm lenses for portraits.
Now which 50mm lens? In my case, I use a Summitar. I like this lens for portrait as it is soft enough to hide skin imperfection, but sharp enough to render all the details of the face, especially the eyes.
The Rigid Summicron I owned (sold it a week ago) was pretty good for portraits, maybe a little too sharp for my taste ... as you can imagine, I don't like the Nokton 50/1.5 for portrait which is way too sharp (but Nico's portraits are amazing with this lens, so I guess it's a matter of processing and post-processing).
That's all I can't say from my experience.
IMHO, it would be better to use a softer lens for portrait than a dead sharp one that needs softening in post-processing.
Some examples with the Summitar, already posted here and elsewhere:
First, which best focal lenght? As Stuart said, short lenses can be good (btw wonderful portraits, Stuart). Personnally, I like 50mm lenses for portraits.
Now which 50mm lens? In my case, I use a Summitar. I like this lens for portrait as it is soft enough to hide skin imperfection, but sharp enough to render all the details of the face, especially the eyes.
The Rigid Summicron I owned (sold it a week ago) was pretty good for portraits, maybe a little too sharp for my taste ... as you can imagine, I don't like the Nokton 50/1.5 for portrait which is way too sharp (but Nico's portraits are amazing with this lens, so I guess it's a matter of processing and post-processing).
That's all I can't say from my experience.
boilerdoc2 said:
IMHO, it would be better to use a softer lens for portrait than a dead sharp one that needs softening in post-processing.
Some examples with the Summitar, already posted here and elsewhere:
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
And I was more than happy to take the noctilux off of Tim's hands (Thanks Tim!!
I think the 50 FL can work well for portraits. I do prefer the 50 lux to the nocti for portraits, and I also wish that you could get in a bit closer with the nocti, but the nocti does have its own unique signature...
Here are some examples shot with portra 160 vc
Very nice images, Paul.
I see that lens has found a loving home