No worries, Vincenzo. I see your dilemma now. I have both of these camera bodies. They present quite different shooting experiences, and not just b/c the 7 has a viewfinder w/ framelines and the T does not. The relative size and weight of the two camera bodies may also be an important factor for you, and also shutter noise. The 7 is much quieter than the T. The T is much smaller and lighter than the 7. How will you use these cameras? What sorts of subjects do you like to shoot? Do you need an accurate meter? (the T's meter, not surprisingly, is better than the meter on the 7). Do you need a camera body that you can put in a coat pocket (favors the T), or do you want a more durable, robust camera built like a Leica M (favors the 7)? Is this going to be a principal camera body for you (I'd pick the 7 then), or a back-up or second body to use alongside another camera (I'd pick the T).
The 7 has framelines for each of the lenses you mention, and it balances very well, IMO, with the Ultron 35. I really enjoy using that camera/lens combo. The 7 is a poor man's Leica M4, IMHO. Stephen Gandy has opined that the 7 was the most advanced LTM rangefinder ever made. I like to use the T w/ a compact lens such as an Elmar 50 or CV 35 skopar, but that's my preference. I think of the T as a Leica IIIf w/ modern conveniences. It's unobtrusive, light weight, and cool to shoot w/. They're both good, but quite different. I like to shoot street, and landscapes (urban and rural); I don't do a lot of portraiture, or low light/night-time shooting. Given that, and the choice between a mint 7 or new T, I'd buy the 7.
