manojd
Established
I have been using the R-D1 for almost 2 years now. But I have been having trouble focusing it in indoor shots. I have tried to put a polarized film inside the eye piece to see if it helps. There are many shots that I miss because of bad focus. Is this because I am usng larger apertures 1.5 - 2 in my indoor shots to make use of available light? The larger aperture gives me a much smaller DOF. Using a fill flash may solve the problem because I cam use a smaller aperture and the DOF will take care of the focus issue.
Does this group have any suggestions? How do you focus your camera and frame the picture?
Does this group have any suggestions? How do you focus your camera and frame the picture?
Tuolumne
Veteran
What focal length lens are you having trouble with? Any fast lens wide open above 50mm is difficult to focus on the R-D1. I sometimes even have trouble focusing my 50mm f1.4 wide open on it.
/T
/T
georgef
Well-known
I sometimes have trouble focusing indoors in low contrast situations, but overall when I am not rushed I seem to have good success. No problem with anything up to a 50 so far, except the canon 50 1.2, and even that, sometimes.
It would not be allignment if only some shots are off. I did realize though, that shooting people indoors is tricky if they move, as it is harder to keep them in track than the stationary subjects.
It would not be allignment if only some shots are off. I did realize though, that shooting people indoors is tricky if they move, as it is harder to keep them in track than the stationary subjects.
manojd
Established
I mostly use Nokton 40 indoors. I focus first on the face for people's photograph and then frame it. I wonder if that is causing any issues. I don't know of any other technique!
kermaier
Well-known
One trick is to focus on the face and then, instead of continually refocusing as the subject moves, you move closer and further to maintain about the same distance. That way you just concentrate on framing and waiting for the right moment. Of course, this doesn't work if the person is walking around the room, but if she's just swaying back and forth in normal conversation, e.g., you just sway with her to maintain focus.
Tuolumne
Veteran
Increase your f-stop to increase the depth of field. That's the easiest way to solve the problem. The R-D1 is good at ISO 1600 so there's lots of leeway to do that.
/T
/T
georgef
Well-known
manojd
Established
georgef
Well-known
it looks focused on the white letters on blue patch; I cant tell any better by the image size; do you remember where you focused?
LCT
ex-newbie
If you focussed on the ear yes at first glance
Difficut to be sure as your pic is too small for checking.
Tuolumne
Veteran
You focused on the right eye. Note that the depth of field is so shallow that the left eye is already not sharp. You have to be careful when you say you "can't focus". Sometimes all you are doing is focusing on the wrong thing.
/T
georgef
Well-known
I can focus my friend, I replied to this, am not the O.P.
I tend to focus on the most contrasty part of the face, then move my body back and forth to adjust. It works for the most part. In this photo, my daughter a) decided to move faster than I can, and b) focusing the 40 1.4 on something 4 feet away gives no leeway wide open.
I also found the 40 1.4 has a much tighter focusing wheel than, say the 28 1.9 which is much easier to focus faster.
I tend to focus on the most contrasty part of the face, then move my body back and forth to adjust. It works for the most part. In this photo, my daughter a) decided to move faster than I can, and b) focusing the 40 1.4 on something 4 feet away gives no leeway wide open.
I also found the 40 1.4 has a much tighter focusing wheel than, say the 28 1.9 which is much easier to focus faster.
Tuolumne
Veteran
I can focus my friend, I replied to this, am not the O.P.
I tend to focus on the most contrasty part of the face, then move my body back and forth to adjust. It works for the most part. In this photo, my daughter a) decided to move faster than I can, and b) focusing the 40 1.4 on something 4 feet away gives no leeway wide open.
I also found the 40 1.4 has a much tighter focusing wheel than, say the 28 1.9 which is much easier to focus faster.
My post was directed to the OP, not you, George.
/T
ferider
Veteran
JNewell
Leica M Recidivist
I sometmes do the same, but with shallow DOF you can be off if the eyes or whatever you wanted to be razor sharp are in a different plane than the edge of the face you've used. Still, I agree, and do the same...but the photog needs to be aware of the possibile issue...sometimes this is all you can do anyway so you go ahead...
tomasis
Well-known
easier focus to lips than eyes. especially when you hold the camera vertically. Lips has same place as eyes.
manojd
Established
I tend to focus on the ears or cheek because it gives a contrasty border. But with this lense at 1.4 or 2, I think I should try to focus a bit further on eyes or lips. What concerns me with my picture is that the eyes and hair are not in focus at all. For that I will have to go for smaller f stops and higher ISO or else use a flash. I am going to try my Xenagon at 2.8 and compare that with the Nokton and see if there is a difference or an actual focusing issue with the lens.
georgef
Well-known
...if you consistently get the same focus result, it may be an allignment issue.
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
It looks soft overall to me, whether I look at the right eye, the ear, or the lettering on the blue patch. I wonder if the shutter speed was a bit too low for good sharpness?
LCT
ex-newbie
Not suprising if you focussed on the ear. Just focus on what you want to be sharp in your pic. The closest eye does it generally.
Last edited: