You mean for the R-D1xG i guess but what about the R-D1x if any?
There is no "if any" at this stage of the game because only the RD-1xG is listed on Epson's web.
Nikon should tell them to choose other characters besides D1x. Maybe if they had brought out a desert edition people would be more enthusiastic. 
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
Obama commemorative with a certificate of authenticity.
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Youtube is awesome, I highly recommend these two videos as relevant to the conversation at hand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnwf2RShNV0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jETv3NURwLc
That is ef-fin hilarious
mani
Well-known
Obama commemorative with a certificate of authenticity.
Pickett - I gotta ask - do you now, have you ever in the past, or do you intend to own the Rd1?
I know you don't have to own a camera to talk absolute BS about it, but you've broken all records with your marathon series of negative posts about this relaunch. I'm REALLY curious.
Did someone drop a printer on you when you were a kid or something?
gdi
Veteran
Yeah! Reinforcements have arrived.
I know nobody listens to me, but I bet they will listen to Jon!!!
Yes, now I can believe it!
cam
the need for speed
mani, thank you! i was going to say something on similar lines but knew you'd do it so much better!
jamriman
Established
I am confused is the R-D1x 2K or 3K? Thanks
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
mani, you appear to be my doppleganger, an absolute apologist for the RD-1. Perhaps in the greater scheme of things, we cancel each other out and balance returns to the force. 
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
And why do you assume I don't own an RD-1? I don't (but did for a while, a decent but now obsolete camera).
cam
the need for speed
And why do you assume I don't own an RD-1? I don't (but did for a while, a decent but now obsolete camera).
obsolete? :bang:
you are so amazingly full of it and yourself.... definitely getting smelly around here.
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
"Obsolete" is not pejorative in my vocabulary. I own many obsolete cameras. Even my old Olympus 1.3mp P&S still takes surprisingly good photos. But $3,000 for a 6mp camera? Come on.
taxi38
Taxi Driver
Its still half the price of a slightly better camera and has the same lenses.Shame about the fixed screen though.
Yeah! Reinforcements have arrived.
I know nobody listens to me, but I bet they will listen to Jon!!!
Doesn't look like it ... google translation appears to be a more trusted source
Last edited:
I am confused is the R-D1x 2K or 3K? Thanks
If you can find one for 2K I'LL TAKE IT
mani
Well-known
And why do you assume I don't own an RD-1? I don't (but did for a while, a decent but now obsolete camera).
I'm sure you did Pickett. I'm absolutely sure you did.
usayit
Well-known
Too much speculation on price...... a lot based on the initial link with a figure in Japanese Yen. IIRC, someone mentioned that Japanese prices generally have taxes and such rolled in.
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Its still half the price of a slightly better camera and has the same lenses.Shame about the fixed screen though.
The Canon 10D can be had for peanuts nowadays
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
"Obsolete" is not pejorative in my vocabulary. I own many obsolete cameras. Even my old Olympus 1.3mp P&S still takes surprisingly good photos. But $3,000 for a 6mp camera? Come on.
You seem to have a value formula that, while perfectly rational for you, it seems you are frustrated that others don't agree with you. Value formulations are highly subjective and individual. Not sure where what I perceive as insecurity or (even, perhaps) frustration is coming from. I grant text on the Inter-webs lacks body language cues.
sonwolf
Established
My two questions about the RD-1x:
Is the rangefinder properly aligned? (I had to take my brand new R-D1 to Steve for alignment, which is crazy for a new camera).
Will the glue hold the camera covering on longer than 1 year? (As you can see, I am a victim of sticky finger syndrome).
I know there are numerous rational technical arguments why the RD-1x is a camera you should not buy. I will offer one affirmative argument. The R-D1 is a camera you can come to truly love, instead of having a one year photo affair that sours when you lay eyes on the newest DSLR. Yes, the R-D1 can be annoying at times, and seem a bit old, even antiquated, but there is a reason some marriages last decades. Unfortunately, love is not an easily quantifiable quality.
In addition to my R-D1, I also own a mid-level DSLR. The technical sophistication of the camera blows the R-D1 away, but when I walk out the door of my house, I always reach for the R-D1 unless I have a specific technical reason to take the DSLR. I simply enjoy using the R-D1 more than the "superior" DSLR.
Is the rangefinder properly aligned? (I had to take my brand new R-D1 to Steve for alignment, which is crazy for a new camera).
Will the glue hold the camera covering on longer than 1 year? (As you can see, I am a victim of sticky finger syndrome).
I know there are numerous rational technical arguments why the RD-1x is a camera you should not buy. I will offer one affirmative argument. The R-D1 is a camera you can come to truly love, instead of having a one year photo affair that sours when you lay eyes on the newest DSLR. Yes, the R-D1 can be annoying at times, and seem a bit old, even antiquated, but there is a reason some marriages last decades. Unfortunately, love is not an easily quantifiable quality.
In addition to my R-D1, I also own a mid-level DSLR. The technical sophistication of the camera blows the R-D1 away, but when I walk out the door of my house, I always reach for the R-D1 unless I have a specific technical reason to take the DSLR. I simply enjoy using the R-D1 more than the "superior" DSLR.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.