maddoc
... likes film again.
Helen, thank u !! 🙂🙂
.... there is no key for the Blacks. I just develop standard and scan, no PP at all.
.... there is no key for the Blacks. I just develop standard and scan, no PP at all.
These photos look good! Has anyone compared the Legacy Pro line of films with Neopan?
Neopan 400 looks pretty good at 400. I used it for a little while, but stopped because it didn't seem to push well (much more contrasty than Tri-X or HP5), so I stayed with Tri-X.
Has anyone tried to push it lately?
I've tried a bit of 1600 - at 1600 - and wasn't overawed by the results. But I'd like to try again at 800 based on some comments here. I have the film in my bag now; - what development do you guys give when exposing at 800?
I've tried to rate neopan 1600 @1000 and get about the same results with Tri-X pushed to 1000 when both are developed in D76 1:1. Tri-X is cheaper and I don't have to worry about airports and such, so I stick to it, I guess.
There is just something about Neopan that makes it look like some grey tones are missing when I make darkroom prints from it. I don't know.