axiom
Non-Registered User
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
I fail to see what's so evil about an unconfirmed rumour.
Yet another useless message brought exclusively to you by the owners of Leica/Nikon/Canon/SonyAlpha/Panasonic/Olympus/Samsung/Yashica/Lomo-rumors.com?
Yet another useless message brought exclusively to you by the owners of Leica/Nikon/Canon/SonyAlpha/Panasonic/Olympus/Samsung/Yashica/Lomo-rumors.com?
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
I fail to see why you shouldn't have noticed the acronym Electronic Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens camera
Dunno if there's any truth in it, but it can only be a matter of time before Canon and Nikon jump on the 'Evil' bandwagon.
axiom
Non-Registered User
By definition, "rumor" is
Anyway, as the title says, this is a rumor.
- A piece of unverified information of uncertain origin usually spread by word of mouth.
- Unverified information received from another; hearsay.
Anyway, as the title says, this is a rumor.
denmark.yuzon
Streetographer
if they are going to do a digital RF, why not a digital canon P instead? in M-mount? lol...
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
Confirmed rumor=true lie.
I really dislike these things; they don't give ideas to the manufacturers and only stir the hope pot.
What'll be next? A consumer's Leica?
I really dislike these things; they don't give ideas to the manufacturers and only stir the hope pot.
What'll be next? A consumer's Leica?
oftheherd
Veteran
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
Consumer Leica=contradiction in terms.
If you're talking about the Minilux with zoom... allow me to crack a subtle smile...
Of course, have a nice day!
If you're talking about the Minilux with zoom... allow me to crack a subtle smile...
Of course, have a nice day!
ZeissFan
Veteran
And it's very appealing how the site owner begs for you to click on links so he can make money.
sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
at least it's an amusing site.
Toyoca 35
Member
But what's a rumour without a hastily PSed picture?
I give you the Canon QD. Technical details, TBA...
I give you the Canon QD. Technical details, TBA...
Last edited:
MaxElmar
Well-known
Ha ha! Well done, Toyoca! 15mm f1.2 indeed!
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
A GIII like version of the EP-1 GF-1 type system would be cool. We'll see. We're also waiting for the Samsung NX series to appear.
irq506
just curious
6 Months
6 Months
Indeed, I heard about this rumour about six months ago when the G11 was being rumoured. I hear about it from the Canon technical guy, and again from one of the management staff of Glazers in Seattle.
I heard that it was 4/3 interchangeable lens system..
6 Months
Indeed, I heard about this rumour about six months ago when the G11 was being rumoured. I hear about it from the Canon technical guy, and again from one of the management staff of Glazers in Seattle.
I heard that it was 4/3 interchangeable lens system..
Fujitsu
Well-known
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
"We"??? I think you must be the only one who's still waiting ... I don't think that train will ever pull into the station!
amateriat
We're all light!
For the sake of the somewhat acronym-challenged, two words: all caps. (EVIL)
Please.
- Barrett
Please.
- Barrett
So wait, will this be a rangefinder?
JoeV
Thin Air, Bright Sun
For the sake of the somewhat acronym-challenged, two words: all caps. (EVIL)
Please.
- Barrett
Or, if it really is an acronym, all caps with periods. (E.V.I.L.).
There are also other variations of these letters that also spell pronouncable words: L.I.V.E., V.E.I.L., V.I.L.E.
And this word: E.L.V.I., which is defined as a convention of Elvis impersonators.
~Joe
boomguy57
Well-known
Canonet QL17 G-III vs. GF1
Canonet QL17 G-III vs. GF1
I love the QL17 G-III, and about a year ago got a GF1. LAst week I finally realized that when held side by side, they are virtually indistinguishable; they both have a 40mm (equivalent on the GF1) f/1.7 lens, the size and weight are basically identical as well. I just wanted to see if anyone else had noticed this, or if someone has one and is thinking of acquiring the other...it might be helpful.
Still, the QL17 works without batteries if need be...not so much with the GF1. I took both of them with me to my most recent trip to London last month, and I have to say that shooting street photography is nice with the GF1 since the AF is so fast. In the end, though, I took far more shots with the QL17.
Canonet QL17 G-III vs. GF1
I love the QL17 G-III, and about a year ago got a GF1. LAst week I finally realized that when held side by side, they are virtually indistinguishable; they both have a 40mm (equivalent on the GF1) f/1.7 lens, the size and weight are basically identical as well. I just wanted to see if anyone else had noticed this, or if someone has one and is thinking of acquiring the other...it might be helpful.
Still, the QL17 works without batteries if need be...not so much with the GF1. I took both of them with me to my most recent trip to London last month, and I have to say that shooting street photography is nice with the GF1 since the AF is so fast. In the end, though, I took far more shots with the QL17.