Canon LTM Rumor: Digital Canon GIII Evil system ?

Canon M39 M39 screw mount bodies/lenses
By definition, "rumor" is
  • A piece of unverified information of uncertain origin usually spread by word of mouth.
  • Unverified information received from another; hearsay.
Hence information cannot be "confirmed" and a "rumor" simultaneously.

Anyway, as the title says, this is a rumor.
 
But what's a rumour without a hastily PSed picture?

I give you the Canon QD. Technical details, TBA...
qld-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
6 Months

6 Months

Indeed, I heard about this rumour about six months ago when the G11 was being rumoured. I hear about it from the Canon technical guy, and again from one of the management staff of Glazers in Seattle.
I heard that it was 4/3 interchangeable lens system..
 
For the sake of the somewhat acronym-challenged, two words: all caps. (EVIL)

Please. 🙂


- Barrett

Or, if it really is an acronym, all caps with periods. (E.V.I.L.).

There are also other variations of these letters that also spell pronouncable words: L.I.V.E., V.E.I.L., V.I.L.E.

And this word: E.L.V.I., which is defined as a convention of Elvis impersonators. 😉

~Joe
 
Canonet QL17 G-III vs. GF1

Canonet QL17 G-III vs. GF1

I love the QL17 G-III, and about a year ago got a GF1. LAst week I finally realized that when held side by side, they are virtually indistinguishable; they both have a 40mm (equivalent on the GF1) f/1.7 lens, the size and weight are basically identical as well. I just wanted to see if anyone else had noticed this, or if someone has one and is thinking of acquiring the other...it might be helpful.

Still, the QL17 works without batteries if need be...not so much with the GF1. I took both of them with me to my most recent trip to London last month, and I have to say that shooting street photography is nice with the GF1 since the AF is so fast. In the end, though, I took far more shots with the QL17.

😎
 
Back
Top Bottom