EI 3200: please suggest

this is neopan 1600 pushed to 6400. developed in Xtol in 1+1 dilution.
contax g2 with 90mm lens.

rhps.jpg

Heyo, you watched Rocky Horror.
I was in the band backing the show. 🙂

I took a couple of band shots using Delta 3200, Tri X 400 and Delta 400 all at 3200. Developer is DD-X.
Btw these are all 35mm, it shows the difference between the three different films and what you want or can achieve with either.


Delta 3200
web.jpg


Delta 3200
web.jpg


Tri X
web.jpg


Tri X
web.jpg


Delta 400
web.jpg


Delta 400
web.jpg


Delta 400
web.jpg
 
I think the three of us posted the message at the same time.
@Christopher, I actually like that shot. Does the negative look thin @1600?

No, it actually looks pretty good. The shadows are full of detail, some of which I let go back in this photo because I liked the dramatic light. The contrast is slightly higher than a normally developed normal film like Tri-X but less contrasty than a 400 film pushed to 1600.
 
Last edited:
I do that too!

Well, I skip the 3000, and shoot it at 200...😛

Just thinking of underexposing color film four stops below its optimal rating, makes me feel... anguish!

But I might be misinformed... Thanks!

Cheers,

Juan

No one suggested underexposing it, someone mentioned a 3 stop push.

I hate D3200. I've tried it, it's awful. Both Tim and Chris' examples of Kodak TMZ are some of the best I've seen and it looks good, but at 1600 I think Neopan is sharper and with less grain. Since we're talking MF then Neopan is now irrelevant.

I'm not sure what I'd try.
 
I've used Ilford Delta 3200 developed in Ilfotec DD-X with reasonably good results. Tried Kodak TMX400 out to 3200 once, and it was a bit more contrasty.

Alternative would be Fuji Provia 400X pushed 3 stops, though I would suggest adding 2/3 to 1 exposure compensation. Tried it once at EI6400 for a jazz concert, but the grain becomes noticeable. I would suggest using an 82A or 82B filter; an 80A would be too much blue. Stage lighting seems to be best with the 82A.
 
I used to shoot a ton of Provia 400 at 3200... surprisingly good results although I can't find anything to post and haven't tried doing so with the new 400x anyone got any examples?
 
I used to shoot a ton of Provia 400 at 3200... surprisingly good results although I can't find anything to post and haven't tried doing so with the new 400x anyone got any examples?

I've shot Provia 400X in 35mm at 3200 and it is unusable for my purposes. From what I've seen the new Kodak Portra 400 is the way to go. It had beat or at least matched Provia 400X in sharpness and push-ability while maintaining a truer color palette.
 
For me...
Tmax P3200 @ IE 3200 processed in XTOL or TMax developers in 35mm.
Ilford Delta 3200 @ ie 3200 processed in DDX developer for medium format.
 
Back
Top Bottom