Zathros,
To my mind, it seems that Phil believed the yellow tint in the glass was an original feature of a lens, as intended by the designer, so that an attempt to remove it would be making it non-original.
True,
But after several other members explained why they would bleach the lens, he still insists that one should not bleach out the yellow, saying that they should get another lens instead.
I am interested in using a lens that functions as its designer intended, not in preserving, as Phil calls it, a "historical oddity". When these lenses were designed, the designers never intended for them to turn yellow after a few decades. This is an unintended side effect of the thoriated glass used in some designs. The designers were using the rare-earth glass because it allowed them to design fast, highly corrected lenses with the technology of the day.
I own two of the affected Takumars, a 50mm f1.4 Super Takumar and a 35mm f2.0 Super Takumar that I bought used on ebay a few years ago. At the time, I was unaware of the tendency of these particular Takumars to turn yellow with age. When I received the lenses, I was disappointed with them, but kept them because I felt that the sellers were not trying to rip me off. Since I was shooting a lot more color back then, I did not find these yellowed lenses very useful. I also did not like looking through the viewfinder with these lenses on the camera. I made do with slower lenses.
When I found out that this yellowing was reversible with exposure to UV radiation, I decided to try it at some point in time.
I consider the bleaching with UV light to be an act of restoration, not alteration. I believe that my lenses will finally perform as Pentax intended them too, once again, after I give them the UV treatment. I never got around to doing this before, since I was not comfortable with leaving the lens in the window for a few weeks while waiting for the sun to do its job. I feel that the OP's method is an elegant solution to the problem. Cheap too!
To quote Brian Sweeney, in post #12 of this thread;
"As far as restoring lenses and cameras to their original and intended working condition, that is the point of camera repair. Radiation Damage in glass is an undesirable side-effect of the materials chosen for their construction and restoring them to their intended state is always desirable."
I think Phil just doesn't get it. His comments seem rather silly to me.