I'm going to agree with this.
I won't go so far as to say all digital cameras are junk, but I will say that I am tired of reading about better technology this, better technology that. Who gets to say what is a better technology? Of course, manufacturers, that's who.
What exactly is it about $7000 worth of Leica, Nikon or Canon that makes it the better camera than my Zeiss Ikonta III? Resolution of images? Probably not. Colour? Debatable. Convenience? Well, to get the images, yes, but portability? No.
As it happens I have not persisted with M cameras, I have a IIIf as my only Leica, and the rest of my cameras are medium format. Why I persist is that I much prefer the experience. If my reasons were for technical image quality, combined with ease of use, then I'd still use medium format.
There is of course the engineering principle of KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) that basically says that it's best to keep an engineering solution as simple as possible. Film cameras are of course a lot simpler than digital, and therefore, to me, the superior engineering solution.