HuubL
hunter-gatherer
I've got an MDa and use it with a Visoflex with my 135 Elmarit. It's a super slick camera, albeit a little heavy. There is a chance that I get an M1 shortly (from the photo department at my work). Which one to keep, that is the question?
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
Nobody...?
Xmas
Veteran
I sold my viso and 200mm way to slow.
Noel
Noel
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
which one *looks* cooler. That is the only question. 
But honestly, I don't know the relative merits of the two well enough to compare them. Keep both?
But honestly, I don't know the relative merits of the two well enough to compare them. Keep both?
physiognomy
Confirmed RF addict...
They are pretty similar cameras...
The M1 was based on the Leica M2 & has a viewfinder with frames for 35 & 50mm only, no rangefinder. The MDa is based on the Leica M4, but has no viewfinder or rangefinder.
I guess if I had to make your decision (not a bad position to be in imho) I would choose the M1 because of the ability to scale focus with a 35mm lens & still have a brightline finder.
Peter
The M1 was based on the Leica M2 & has a viewfinder with frames for 35 & 50mm only, no rangefinder. The MDa is based on the Leica M4, but has no viewfinder or rangefinder.
I guess if I had to make your decision (not a bad position to be in imho) I would choose the M1 because of the ability to scale focus with a 35mm lens & still have a brightline finder.
Peter
M
merciful
Guest
And, of course, one can go to the effort of converting an M1 to an RF camera, while that can't be done to an MD. Well, I suppose it, can but it'll take even more expensive parts.
physiognomy said:I guess if I had to make your decision (not a bad position to be in imho) I would choose the M1 because of the ability to scale focus with a 35mm lens & still have a brightline finder.
Peter
Share: