seany65
Well-known
I've just got a Minolta 110 zoom slr and while there are too many things wrong with it to justify getting it fixed as I think the cumulative cost would be too much, I have a couple of observations which may be of interest to those who may be thinking of buying one.
1) Even though at 25mm the image is a little smaller than with a mk2 (0.56x vs 0.68x), in good light outdoors I think the mark one's microprism rangefinder is a little easier to focus at that focal length because with the mk2's split-image rangefinder there is only a tiny amount of movement of one half compared to the other half.
2) In lower light the mk2 is easier to focus at most distances, especially if the object is quite small.
3) There seems to be little difference in brightness of the focusing screens even though the mark one's lens is at f4.5 and the mk2's is at f3.5. However, I have recently bought a second mk2 (with the logo in place of the "o" in "minolta") and its screen is a little darker than both.
4) The mark one's viewfinder is "cooler" in tone than either version of the mk2.
1) Even though at 25mm the image is a little smaller than with a mk2 (0.56x vs 0.68x), in good light outdoors I think the mark one's microprism rangefinder is a little easier to focus at that focal length because with the mk2's split-image rangefinder there is only a tiny amount of movement of one half compared to the other half.
2) In lower light the mk2 is easier to focus at most distances, especially if the object is quite small.
3) There seems to be little difference in brightness of the focusing screens even though the mark one's lens is at f4.5 and the mk2's is at f3.5. However, I have recently bought a second mk2 (with the logo in place of the "o" in "minolta") and its screen is a little darker than both.
4) The mark one's viewfinder is "cooler" in tone than either version of the mk2.