SebastianN
Newbie
I asked a question a while back, where I needed your advice about which of my lenses I ought to sell: The 35mm or 50mm Summilux-ASPH. The overwhelming response was to sell my M8, and I ended up taking your advice. Anyway, I needed the cash to buy a car for work, and in the end I was about to do that, but my boss agreed to give me a 2 year lease on a Toyota, so I've got a car, I got the lenses - but no camera.
I'm gonna wait a while to go down the M8 route again, and will settle for a film body at the moment.
I've been offered (locally) a Leica M7 for $1900 or a Zeiss Ikon for $1000. I really learned to appreciate AE, so it's gonna be one of those. Build quality of them are not that really important, but I was wondering if those prices are out of whack. Both come with all the boxes, papers and stuff, so no difference there. I've done the usual rounds at eBay, and prices seems to be in that range, but M7 differs in price from $1700 to $2500 - and I can't seem to understand why. Is there something I should look out for.
Any advice is deeply appreciated
I'm gonna wait a while to go down the M8 route again, and will settle for a film body at the moment.
I've been offered (locally) a Leica M7 for $1900 or a Zeiss Ikon for $1000. I really learned to appreciate AE, so it's gonna be one of those. Build quality of them are not that really important, but I was wondering if those prices are out of whack. Both come with all the boxes, papers and stuff, so no difference there. I've done the usual rounds at eBay, and prices seems to be in that range, but M7 differs in price from $1700 to $2500 - and I can't seem to understand why. Is there something I should look out for.
Any advice is deeply appreciated
bennyng
Benny Ng
I have a tendency to pick up my ZI over the M7. I prefer the handling on the ZI and the larger viewfinder. And in your case, there's an extra $900 in your pocket without any compromise in functions.
However, if you like to shoot with longer focal lengths, do take note that the ZI has an 85mm frameline. The M7 0.72 would have both 75mm and 90mm framelines.
Cheers,
However, if you like to shoot with longer focal lengths, do take note that the ZI has an 85mm frameline. The M7 0.72 would have both 75mm and 90mm framelines.
Cheers,
infrequent
Well-known
$700 hexar RF
Austerby
Well-known
There was a change in the viewfinders fitted to M7s - later models have the improved viewfinder as fitted to the MP so that may account for some of the pricing differential. There are a lot more M7s for sale than ZIs and they have been around for longer, so factors such as overall condition come into play too.
I have an M7 and it's a wonderful camera - you won't be disappointed in the slightest if you choose the Leica.
I have an M7 and it's a wonderful camera - you won't be disappointed in the slightest if you choose the Leica.
srtiwari
Daktari
Another option is a Bessa R3A/R4A, which is considerably cheaper, allows you to use AE, and can postpone the bigger purchase until you are sure of what you want.
DelDavis
.
For what it's worth, I've had good success shooting with my 90mm Summicron on my Ikon. That the 85mm framelines provide a slightly wider field of view than 90mm doesn't pose a problem.
retnull
Well-known
Hexar RF...$600 - $800
MichaelW
Established
I'd buy the Zeiss, no hesitation. With the $900 you save you can pick up another lens or some useful piece of gear.
tmfabian
I met a man once...
either way you can't really go wrong. I would suggest however that you check out the dx contacts in the m7 and see if it has been upgraded to the optical reader. If it has been upgraded, i'd buy the m7 in a jiffy, but if it has the older style it's pretty much a toss up and regardless of which you buy you end up with a swank camera.
kevin m
Veteran
The only practical downside to the VC bodies is the short-base finder. It's not nearly as accurate as the Leica/Ikon finders for focusing fast/long lenses at any distance.
pau3
Well-known
Hold both in your hands, and think about yourself taking pictures with them.
If you like the Zeiss Ikon enough, then, fine, you'll have some cash left if you go for it.
But if you buy the Zeiss Ikon now and then realize that what you wanted was
the Leica, oh, man, then you will have made a wrong decision. Compare yourself.
They're different.
Best,
Pau
If you like the Zeiss Ikon enough, then, fine, you'll have some cash left if you go for it.
But if you buy the Zeiss Ikon now and then realize that what you wanted was
the Leica, oh, man, then you will have made a wrong decision. Compare yourself.
They're different.
Best,
Pau
mervynyan
Mervyn Yan
Based on resell value, I'd go with Leica.
35mmdelux
Veni, vidi, vici
since it is temp, get the zeiss
peter_n
Veteran
You already have great glass and if you're going to get another dRF you should probably look for a least cost/reliable interim film solution that you can sell on. I think if you're staying with your 35 and 50mm lenses a used Bessa will do fine. They are good cameras.
jbf
||||||
Personally I just recently purchased an M7 and have recently owned ZIs before. While I loved the viewfinder in the ZIs, I just wasnt sold on the camera. Perhaps i was paranoid and what not, but I wanted a camera that I knew would be more robust of a camera. I figured the M7 would be that.
I just picked up a BGN M7 from KEH for around 1600 dollars. It has the MP finder upgrade according to leica, so now im just waiting for the camera to arrive here so i can start looking at it/inspect and use it.
I just picked up a BGN M7 from KEH for around 1600 dollars. It has the MP finder upgrade according to leica, so now im just waiting for the camera to arrive here so i can start looking at it/inspect and use it.
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
The M7 is the last in a legendary line of Leica M film cameras. There's a reason why tens of thousands of Ms are out there ranging in age from over 50 to brand new. You will never regret buying the M7.
CK Dexter Haven
Well-known
I've owned both. I currently have the Ikon.
The M7 looks a bit better, feels a bit better. But the view through the Ikon is better. And, it's more important what my eye sees than what my hand feels, so i prefer the Ikon. When i first made the switch, the Ikon felt a little "light." But, that's really only in direct comparison to the Leica. With a lens on it, it feels like it ought to feel. I don't miss the 'extra' weight.
As mentioned, the savings gets you another lens, more film, processing, a better scanner, or part of a trip somewhere to take more compelling pictures.
I paid a hair under $1000 for a mint used Ikon, in April 08. I paid about $2000 for a .85 M7 in March 07.
The M7 looks a bit better, feels a bit better. But the view through the Ikon is better. And, it's more important what my eye sees than what my hand feels, so i prefer the Ikon. When i first made the switch, the Ikon felt a little "light." But, that's really only in direct comparison to the Leica. With a lens on it, it feels like it ought to feel. I don't miss the 'extra' weight.
As mentioned, the savings gets you another lens, more film, processing, a better scanner, or part of a trip somewhere to take more compelling pictures.
I paid a hair under $1000 for a mint used Ikon, in April 08. I paid about $2000 for a .85 M7 in March 07.
thomasw_
Well-known
hmm, Paul it is interesting how you see this. I figure the same as you on one level: this is a temporary film body purchase for which the OP claims he will "settle". Both options involve buying a used film body with AE.
But I say purchase the M7 as it will lose less value than a ZI. On a strictly monetary basis, you will be ahead when you resell. Another aspect is weighing out the ZI vs M7 reliability; in this case, especially since it is a temporary measure, the M7 has less of a chance of going out of alignment than the ZI. That said, both bodies rely on some electronics; but if you are buying a film body as a temporary possession I would go with the body that is reputed to be more robust.
just my 2p cdn.
furcafe
Veteran
A similar caveat applies to the Hexar RF, which has a low-magnification VF that is better for using wides. While one can accurately focus telephotos & the Noctilux on a Hexar, it wouldn't be my 1st choice.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Absolutely try them both in the hand and pick the one that feels right. I'd choose the M7- much quieter, will likely go longer w/o needing an RF adjustment from what I've heard.
These two use a very different interface for exposure compensation when in AE- if you use exp. comp. a lot the ZM might be a little easier in that regard. Try them both in hand.
These two use a very different interface for exposure compensation when in AE- if you use exp. comp. a lot the ZM might be a little easier in that regard. Try them both in hand.