kermaier
Well-known
I got this lens not too long ago so I haven't experimented too much, but I was wondering if anyone has an opinion as to what could be causing the black shape in the sky in this shot. It appeared in the same place in many shots. I used a hood and also had a uva filter on for some shots (leica telyt).
If you're shooting on a digital body (M8, M9, R-D1), that's probably a speck of dirt on your digital sensor. This sort of thing only shows against bright backgrounds (like the sky) and when the lens is stopped down to about f/8 or smaller.
If you're shooting film, check to see if there's any crud in the rear element group of the lens.
::Ari
Zeisscolor
Newbie
Wide open
Off finder shooting

Off finder shooting

kemal_mumcu
Well-known
Wide open
![]()
Love this shot zeisscolor. Was this at the minimum focus distance? Just curious.
Zeisscolor
Newbie
Hi Kemal I remember that was 0.5m not the minimum distance.
kermaier
Well-known
anyone here have a spare front cap for the SA?![]()
I've discovered that the grey hammertone lens cap from an old Leitz slide projector has the same 52.5mm internal diameter as the original black plastic cap for the 21/3.4 SA, and is much cheaper if you can find one. The projector cap is much shallower than the SA cap, so it won't stay on if you have a 48mm filter mounted on the lens; but it works just fine to protect the front element while not in use.
::Ari
abenner
undecided
Anyone aware of a smaller option for a hood on the SA? Probably would have to be some sort of low profile ring... and an accompanying cap would be nice.
kermaier
Well-known
Helen, why is the light fall-off so pronounced on just the left side?
Ari
Ari
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
Hi Ari, a few factors bUt not a light leak....Helen, why is the light fall-off so pronounced on just the left side?
Ari
zapped Film arista premium / had a bunch of rolls with a strange Band through them
pushed film w/ not gentle agitation
ALL added to this Strange Charm & Atmosphere
though a Purist in the Darkroom may be Horrified...
the 21 never lets You Down, even if other things Fail ...
kemal_mumcu
Well-known
Gorgeous image Helen. Love what you see with your eye. I noticed the fall-off too but I don't think it distracts from the image at all.
kermaier
Well-known
Hi Ari, a few factors bUt not a light leak....
zapped Film arista premium / had a bunch of rolls with a strange Band through them
pushed film w/ not gentle agitation
ALL added to this Strange Charm & Atmosphere
though a Purist in the Darkroom may be Horrified...
the 21 never lets You Down, even if other things Fail ...![]()
Ah, OK -- that explains it. I know the SA itself has some fall-off in the corners at wider apertures ("some"="tons" on the R-D1
Really nice picture though, as usual. You really know how to find the right images for this lens!
::Ari
didjiman
Richard Man
I have you guys to know that it is BECAUSE OF THIS THREAD that I got the SA21 instead of the Zeiss 21/2.8. Fun lens:
http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/PICS/CapoeiraPA2010/
http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/PICS/NGSculptureGarden10/
You guys are horrid!
http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/PICS/CapoeiraPA2010/
http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/PICS/NGSculptureGarden10/
You guys are horrid!
S
Simon D.
Guest
Stone Town, Zanzibar 2009
Shot on the move!

Shot on the move!
matt335
Well-known
This is great Simon, would you say that this lens is easy to use like this? On the move? I mean just being aware of exposure and a rough focus?Stone Town, Zanzibar 2009
Shot on the move!
S
Simon D.
Guest
Thanks Matt! Its not something that I do lots of but yes I would say that this lens is very easy to shoot on the move. The depth of field is pretty massive so even in poor light focus is relatively easy to achieve. If you can keep the aperture at f11 then I think you have half a metre to infinity in focus!
Simon
Simon
Olivier S.
Member
Nokton48
Veteran
I'll wager this is a 21mm F3.4 snap/some famous Blokes
I'll wager this is a 21mm F3.4 snap/some famous Blokes
21mm F3.4 Super Angulon, I'll wager. Great for portraits in the right hands.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380221778625&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
I'll wager this is a 21mm F3.4 snap/some famous Blokes
21mm F3.4 Super Angulon, I'll wager. Great for portraits in the right hands.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380221778625&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
kermaier
Well-known
21mm F3.4 Super Angulon, I'll wager. Great for portraits in the right hands.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380221778625&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
Yes, there are a number of photos from the 1960s in Jim Marshall's book "Not Fade Away" that he notes were done with a 21mm lens on an M4.
Ari
mackigator
Well-known
Any chance this lens would mount on a Bessa R2, Minolta CLE, or Hexar RF? It doesn't look promising, looking at how deep the rear element goes.
sleepyhead
Well-known
CLE no problem, I used to use that comb o all the time - you lose TTL metering though.
R2, I don't know.
R2, I don't know.
khc1013
Anthony
I have read this thread over three times. and this lens is growing in me.
nice shots everyone.
nice shots everyone.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.