21mm Super Angulon

I'm growing weak... Very weak. Just got myself a CV 21 to try out the FOV. If I can feel comfortable with the 21mm, then who knows!
 
Looks like a great lens, lots of nice images here.
How does the 21 3.4 Super Angulon perform on the Monochrom? Anyone have this combo?
It is pretty obvious that the lens was designed for film only but does it work on a FF Rangefinder?
 
Jan Pedersen said:
Looks like a great lens, lots of nice images here.
How does the 21 3.4 Super Angulon perform on the Monochrom? Anyone have this combo?
It is pretty obvious that the lens was designed for film only but does it work on a FF Rangefinder?
Click to expand...

Some people are happy with it on a monochrom - I haven't had much luck. Smeared corners and loads of vignetting - I couldn't figure out the right mojo to apply in lightroom/photoshop.
 
King Tut's

King Tut's

untitled-159-Edit-500x751.jpg


Leica M3, 4/21 SA, B+W Yellow Filter, Ilford Delta 100, HC-110 (Dil. B - 6min)

You can read the backstory to this famous Glasgow live gig bar at my blog, by clicking here.
 
Never believe what you read. I can certainly testify to the fact that the 4/21 SA is one of the most under-rated lenses out there - some of my best shots have been with this lens. It has a certain quality and rendering to it. Its also much smaller and compact than the 3.4/21 - but with all that brass to it, it weighs a little for its size. The only bad thing about it is that you can't use the internal camera meter with it; you have to use a handheld meter.

You can find a whole series of shots taken with this little gem on my blog at http://jbhthescots.com/tag/f421mm-super-angulon/
 
jbhthescots said:
Never believe what you read. l]
Click to expand...

I don't believe everything I read but I do respect certain members opinions who have had extensive experience with many lenses, hence the pleasant surprise. The 4/21 could be a good choice for my iiic as I believe they were available in LTM as well as M mount
 
Some people are happy with it on a monochrom - I haven't had much luck. Smeared corners and loads of vignetting - I couldn't figure out the right mojo to apply in lightroom/photoshop.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Good to know.
The current 21mm from Leica, the Super Elmar, is that identical to the 3.4 Super Angulon or has it been improved for digital sensors?
I am only guessing here but i assume that Leica can't use the Super Angulon name that is a Schneider trade name and therefore call it a Super Elmar instead.
 
Well, seeing as how I had one I thought it might be a cheaper SA for my M...

IMG_2443 by dralowid, on Flickr

It really doesn't make a whole lot of sense, not having a rangefinder is no problem with 21mm but even the CV viewfinder (not in pic) gets blocked by the lens and this is without the hood.

I'll put it back on the Sony where it spends most of its time.

I'm not too sure about comparisons between SA R and M. The first R one was 3.4 and required mirror lock up, the second, this one was F4 and retrofocus.

I'd guess that the 3.4 is optically similar in both mounts and the 4.0 are quite different in design?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom