21mm Super Angulon

Thank you Vincent !

Actually, I would be happy being able to share photos taken with any of the lenses that I own... just a question of time spent on the job and on photography ... :bang:

Vincent.G said:
This is timely and useful information especially to those who are following the M5 thread and are also interested in the 21SA.

Gabor, it's been some time since you shared photos taken with the 21SA. Really hope to see your work soon!

Lem: nice wide perspective! So many interesting elements in one frame!
Click to expand...
 
JHutchins said:
I really love this lens. One of the wisest unwise decisions I've made.

med_U49953I1447385462.SEQ.1.jpg
[/IMG]

med_U49953I1447385461.SEQ.0.jpg
[/IMG]
Click to expand...
Very nice pictures. The SA is a timeless high quality lens.
Thanks lot.
לראות אותך בקרוב
 
giganova said:
What hood options are there? All I could find are in the $200-500 range ... for a hood! :bang: Are there any cheaper third party hoods?
Click to expand...

Not that I've seen. It would need to be a 48mm screw in wide angle hood.

You need the 12501 or the 12501M (for some reason the M version is a lot more expensive). They can sometimes be found for around $100 - but it would almost cheaper to buy another lens with the hood, then sell the lens.

Unfortunately they're all black (and big) too - it would mess with your chrome kit!
 
Papercut said:
No apology necessary, Matt. Those are lovely. Especially like #2 and #4. Well done!

This lens is back on my radar as I've moved to "classic glass". I think it would make a great set with my 35 and 50 summilux pre-asph lenses.

So, post more, everyone! 😀
Click to expand...

You're not the first to put these three together!

The next question is on what bodies?

While I don't have the 50mm summilux pre asph, it matches very well with the 35.
 
ha ha Kevin, Michael, I am in the same boat 🙂
I have the 35 - 50 lux pre and lusting after a 21SA since years!
I would also throw in the nikkor 5cm 1.4 (I have one but I still need to get an S to M adapter to be able to use it). Looking at the nikkor thread at wide aperture I would say it will be a better fit with the lux 35 and 21SA.
ref the body...3x M2 🙂 (just need to get myself a third one...)

Giulio
 
giulio stucchi said:
ha ha Kevin, Michael, I am in the same boat 🙂
I have the 35 - 50 lux pre and lusting after a 21SA since years!
I would also throw in the nikkor 5cm 1.4 (I have one but I still need to get an S to M adapter to be able to use it). Looking at the nikkor thread at wide aperture I would say it will be a better fit with the lux 35 and 21SA.
ref the body...3x M2 🙂 (just need to get myself a third one...)

Giulio
Click to expand...

As long as the M2's are all original black paint...(and look like Erik's)

I'm not a 50 person, so I suppose I'd have to go for the 2/85mm Nikkor.
A few year ago there was an auction that included a pair of black paint M2's, one with a SA, the other with the 2/85 Nikkor. They had belonged to a press photographer and had seen some use. Would've been a nice pair, but alas, they went for a small fortune.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Super Angulon R 21mm .....can I adapt this two a film M
Replies
4
Views
972
pgk
P
B
Leica Super-Elmar-M 21 f/3.4 ASPH
Replies
2
Views
643
Brick33308
B
A
Anyone ever had a Summitar with a mismatch of parts and gotten it to work?
Replies
9
Views
394
wlewisiii
W
N
Hasselblad SW w. Schneider Kreuznach 47/f8 Super Angulon
Replies
2
Views
1K
Vince Lupo
Vince Lupo
J
  • Article Article
Buying on eBay: A Savvy Guide to the World’s Top Online Auction Site
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
WoodallP
WoodallP
Back
Top Bottom