Trius
Waiting on Maitani
Willy: Have you or anyone queried Fuji about this?
23mm on X100T or 23/1.4
- Thread starter Trius
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 74
- Views 10K
willie_901
Veteran
Nope. They all did it.
But I am considering picking up a X100T (sold my first X100 to fund a lens for the XT-1 bodies) and your response peaked my curiosity.
Wading through Flickr results filtered for X100 I saw flare results similar to mine.
To my surprise, I could not find a single example of these asymmetrical artifacts in Flickr photos filtered for the X100T. Any issues with overexposed point source lights rendered as they do with every other digital camera I've owned.
So I'm going sell the X-Pro1 and pick up a X100T.
But I am considering picking up a X100T (sold my first X100 to fund a lens for the XT-1 bodies) and your response peaked my curiosity.
Wading through Flickr results filtered for X100 I saw flare results similar to mine.
To my surprise, I could not find a single example of these asymmetrical artifacts in Flickr photos filtered for the X100T. Any issues with overexposed point source lights rendered as they do with every other digital camera I've owned.
So I'm going sell the X-Pro1 and pick up a X100T.
FrankS
Registered User
The X100T is a good solution for those who are okay with 35mm equivalent and don't want the pressure of an interchangeable lens camera, like the Rolleiflex compared to a hasselblad.
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
This X100T night shot posted on Twitter is simply great.
https://twitter.com/bnwaneampeh/status/660164753726271488
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
willie_901
Veteran
So yesterday Fujifilm announced a sale from Nov 8 through Dec 26. The X100T will be available with a $200 instant discount (no rebate paperwork).
The only decision left is chrome or black.
When I used the original chrome X100 strangers and authority figures seemed unable to see the camera. I decided they thought it was just an old-fashion film camera and therefore harmless. This was good.
It is possible its size and thin lens profile was more responsible for the low-hassle factor than the retro chrome styling. And I have always preferred the look of black bodies. I suspect strangers take black-bodied cameras more seriously as practically all DSLRs have black bodies.
Ken Rockwell claims "chrome is the new black". Is he right?
The only decision left is chrome or black.
When I used the original chrome X100 strangers and authority figures seemed unable to see the camera. I decided they thought it was just an old-fashion film camera and therefore harmless. This was good.
It is possible its size and thin lens profile was more responsible for the low-hassle factor than the retro chrome styling. And I have always preferred the look of black bodies. I suspect strangers take black-bodied cameras more seriously as practically all DSLRs have black bodies.
Ken Rockwell claims "chrome is the new black". Is he right?
back alley
IMAGES
modern 'chrome' looks cheap & plastic to me…black all the way!
FrankS
Registered User
I think you're right. Chrome is more retro and less serious than black. If this is important to your photography then Chrome.
Like Joe, I like the look of black better.
Chrome or black?
Yes. 🙂
But did Fuji really announce a discount this far in advance?
Yes. 🙂
But did Fuji really announce a discount this far in advance?
GaryLH
Veteran
Prefer black myself..
Gary
Gary
aizan
Veteran
chrome! the stupid bright white built-in flash really stands out on the black version. plus, the speckled finish doesn't do it for me, especially on a camera body where the textured leatherette covering goes all the way across. on a "classic looking" camera, it really should be a smooth paint job.
if most of the body was bare with leatherette confined to the grip, sort of like a 1990s camera, it would look ok. the sleeker body detailing of the x100t is sort of moving in that direction, but it's caught up with the whole band of leatherette thing.
if most of the body was bare with leatherette confined to the grip, sort of like a 1990s camera, it would look ok. the sleeker body detailing of the x100t is sort of moving in that direction, but it's caught up with the whole band of leatherette thing.
Speckled paint finish? The black paint isn't 'speckled' unless I'm not following what you wrote
gilpen123
Gil
Please give me the link of this promo sale....also interested with the X100T
thanks
thanks
Pablito
coco frío
For what it's worth, I find the flare of the x100_ lens impossible to control and far worse than any example posted above. It has to do with bright light sources just outside the frame. You should google this problem and read about it on this and other forums. It prevents me from using the camera as I originally intended because huge patches of smoky flare can ruin photos. The camera went to Fuji, they replaced the lens, no change. Tried all the different hood styles available. Not using a filter. I sill use the camera but have to be extremely mindful of any situation that involves shooting into the light, or with bright light just outside the frame. The camera is fine but not if you need a totally relible tool. I have not had a problem like this with any pro equipment I have owned from Nikon, Leica, etc in the last 40 years. The XT1 with the 23mm 1.4 is extremely well behaved and does not exhibit any of these eccentricities.
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
I posted on the 27 vs 35 thread that I went a different direction, and I even surprised myself. I bought an XPro-1 w/18-55 on evil-bay. With the X200 coming and the prices of XPro1 bodies being so good, I decided to dive in with a interchangeable mount system. From what I understand firmware updates have kept the XPro pretty "fresh", and I'll also be using manual focus with adapters and legacy primes.
An X100 or X200 (?) may be in my future, but right now spending about $500USD less was a big consideration for me.
An X100 or X200 (?) may be in my future, but right now spending about $500USD less was a big consideration for me.
FrankS
Registered User
All right, Earl!
willie_901
Veteran
willie_901
Veteran
But Chrome or black?
willie_901
Veteran
The less serious look is beneficial so I'm leaning this way. I will use the camera in public to photograph strangers and on private property (shopping venues, bars, restaurants, etc) where the owners could tell me to stop.
I have to decide tomorrow.
FrankS
Registered User
It sounds like your photography requires the acceptance of strangers, so the less intimidating the camera, the better. The photographers behaviour/demeanour is probably more important, but that can't be selected during a camera purchase like black or Chrome.
Edit: I don't like the way that auto-correct capitalizes Chrome!
Edit: I don't like the way that auto-correct capitalizes Chrome!
Similar threads
