I have no experience with the Voigtänder 35/1.2 and have no idea what its imaging signature looks like. 🙂
G
Okay. Looks fine to me, but I don't see anything that's gonna make me want to sell my Summilux 35mm... Not to mention that it looks like it's about 3x the size and weight!Hello everybody....I just bought this lens the other day and I am pretty happy with the results so far. I have never shot with a 35mm focal length lens before and it is starting to grow on me. I am going to go to Laos next week for a photo trip and I plan on taking this lens with me. As for now, I'm carrying it everywhere I go so I can get used to it. Here are a couple of shots that were taken in my neighborhood. I would love to see what others are doing with this lens as well...please excuse the poor scans (local lab)...I am in the process of purchasing a scanner......
cheers, michael
- Leica All Day
- Replies: 860
- Forum: Voigtlander Lenses and Images
There was a time when I mainly used the f1.2 on my M9 because of the rendering, and the way it sucked in light. Matt Alofs said in his online review that he suspected the light transmission was more akin to f1. Disappointingly, the accompanying images have gone, but the text remains. His sentence, 'faces float up from the shadows' perfectly describes this lens, and remember that when Matt wrote that review, it was in 2007, and he shot film with it.Okay. Looks fine to me, but I don't see anything that's gonna make me want to sell my Summilux 35mm... Not to mention that it looks like it's about 3x the size and weight!
View attachment 4872732
The Summilux 35mm f/1.4 type II from 1972 weighs only 187g sans hood and/or filter. It's only about half a stop slower than the Nokton 35mm f/1.2. 🙂
G