Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
How old the 7200 Plustek scanners are now? Ten years?
I checked local classifieds and get one for 30 CAD ($25) in original box, soft case, CD, etc; in good working order.
Installed driver from provided CD and scanned some imperfect bw negatives, which I have trouble to scan with newer Pacific Image 7200 and some of them ain't so good for darkroom prints.
VueScan was used for control. Minimum editing in old LR version on XP machine. Scanner is fast at 1800-2400 dpi and my XP laptop is fast as well for everything comparing to home PC with x64 Win 7 Home edition on it and more CPU power.
My Pacific Image 7200 scanner would not scan those underexposed negatives like this Plustek 7200 did. PI 7200 is not good with negatives where exposure isn't perfect. My Epson V500 would scan with similar results, but as any flatbed it is limited in sharpness (resolution) on 135 film.
Not so bad for $30 as of now scanner, I guess.
Film is HP5+ @1200 and I was under exposing due to slow lens (25 f4).
Cheers, Ko.
I checked local classifieds and get one for 30 CAD ($25) in original box, soft case, CD, etc; in good working order.
Installed driver from provided CD and scanned some imperfect bw negatives, which I have trouble to scan with newer Pacific Image 7200 and some of them ain't so good for darkroom prints.
VueScan was used for control. Minimum editing in old LR version on XP machine. Scanner is fast at 1800-2400 dpi and my XP laptop is fast as well for everything comparing to home PC with x64 Win 7 Home edition on it and more CPU power.
My Pacific Image 7200 scanner would not scan those underexposed negatives like this Plustek 7200 did. PI 7200 is not good with negatives where exposure isn't perfect. My Epson V500 would scan with similar results, but as any flatbed it is limited in sharpness (resolution) on 135 film.
Not so bad for $30 as of now scanner, I guess.
Film is HP5+ @1200 and I was under exposing due to slow lens (25 f4).
Cheers, Ko.
