30mm f/5.6 lens

Yes, I am still having a 30/5.6 and using it:

20120812_0022.jpg
 
I have one XPAN II body and the 45mm lens. I used to have the 90mm and 30mm lenses too, but didn't use them much so I ended up trading them away.

The 45mm works well outdoors while the 30mm is a better choice for indoor shooting in confined spaces in my experience.

I regret letting the 30mm go, as there are times when it would come in handy; I am planning on replacing it when I can. I am still of the opinion that the 45mm is the best all around lens for the XPAN, but the 30mm is a close second.
 
I have a question about the 30mm lens. If you switch to non panoramic mode with your XPan/TX- camera, do you get accurate frame lines in the camera viewfinder? My guess is no, but that's only a guess. Perhaps this lens is only for panoramic use.
 
I have a question about the 30mm lens. If you switch to non panoramic mode with your XPan/TX- camera, do you get accurate frame lines in the camera viewfinder? My guess is no, but that's only a guess. Perhaps this lens is only for panoramic use.

Yes, there is a frame in the middle of the viewfinder, see this picture:

13714147_585996801583178_464839837_n.jpg
 
How many people here have the 30mm f/5.6 lens for their Hassy/Fuji panorama camera? Do you find this too wide to use often or is it your main, go-to lens? I don't have it and I find myself wanting it really bad. The problem is of course, the amazing cost.

Too wide too much of the time. In today's overdeveloped world, I too often ran into a utility pole, sign, or remote weather station with such a wide lens. And with the necessary center filter, it is an f/8 equivalent lens even wide open.

The horizontal field of the 45mm lens is more useful; but it can be too limiting in the vertical plane. Pictures require some height in order to show enough foreground. The extreme aspect ratio, 2.66:1, of the XPAN is limiting in that way. Even 70mm Panavision is only 2.21:1!

For me, the ideal XPAN would have had a lens between 35 and 40mm. The 38mm Biogon of the SWC would be just about right. And I'd have made it with a 54mm gate width, not 65mm. That's so the film would be the right size for my Hasselblad PCP80 projector! Again, that's just for me! Others have made wonderful use of the 30mm. See, for instance, f/16sunshine's shot, above!

So what do you think I did? I sold my XPAN and shoot my outdoor panoramic with my SWC with its 38mm lens, or my 500CM with a 40mm!
 
When i got my XPan it was a package deal with the body+30+45. I thought i would sell the 30mm (and get a reasonably priced basic set that way), because i had never been very familiar with that wide lenses in any format. It had always happened that very soon after starting to use a superwide i noticed all the photos i´d taken with it were just about the special wide-angle effect. But what happened ? I noticed liking the 30mm a lot already in the beginning. After 2 years with the XPan i love the lens, it´s my favourite even. The panorama format for me is the perfect way to use a lens even this wide. I like grain, so i don´t mind it being slow, just shoot ISO 1600 indoors. See my Flickr, if you like.
 
Back
Top Bottom