back alley
IMAGES
the 35/3.5 arrived in today's mail!
it is a sweet little gem of a lens, even smaller than the 35/2.8 which i thought was very small.
the finder has some brassing on top but i opened it up & cleaned it and omg is it clear & bright!
the lens itself has a tiny bit of brassing in one place (that i noticed so far), the glass is completely unscratched but it looks like an internal cleaning is in order. i want to shoot with it first before i even think about sending it off or taking it apart myself.
the focus is like butta and the aperture ring turns very smoothly.
no click stops though, i don't care for that.
i love new gear!!
joe
it is a sweet little gem of a lens, even smaller than the 35/2.8 which i thought was very small.
the finder has some brassing on top but i opened it up & cleaned it and omg is it clear & bright!
the lens itself has a tiny bit of brassing in one place (that i noticed so far), the glass is completely unscratched but it looks like an internal cleaning is in order. i want to shoot with it first before i even think about sending it off or taking it apart myself.
the focus is like butta and the aperture ring turns very smoothly.
no click stops though, i don't care for that.
i love new gear!!
joe
taffer
void
Congrats Joe !!!!!
But... let's see, Canon P + 35/1.8, P + 35/2, P+35/2.8....
When's the new P arriving ?
But... let's see, Canon P + 35/1.8, P + 35/2, P+35/2.8....
When's the new P arriving ?
back alley
IMAGES
taffer said:
am i THAT transparent?
joe
W
wlewisiii
Guest
So when do the 35/1.5 and 35/3.2 arrive? :angel: Plus thier matching P's, of course...
William
William
back alley
IMAGES
wlewisiii said:So when do the 35/1.5 and 35/3.2 arrive? :angel: Plus thier matching P's, of course...
William
in truth, i think i'm done with the bodies except for a 6l, someday.
i would like to 'collect' the 1.5 and the 3.2, but the price would have to be just right. other than for the sake of collecting i'm not sure what they might offer me.
this 3.5 might be my winter daylight lens, stopped down and razor sharp (one hopes
)though it IS very cool to have four 35mm lenses now.
i'm understanding those 50's collectors a bit better now.
joe
taffer
void
back alley said:
I think I could watch TV thru you
The 35/1.5... that's one curious piece of glass. Sean Reid's tests put it on the soft side but that shouldn't put as aside of plain good curiosity
back alley
IMAGES
taffer said:I think I could watch TV thru you
The 35/1.5... that's one curious piece of glass. Sean Reid's tests put it on the soft side but that shouldn't put as aside of plain good curiosity
lol!!
yeah, the 1.5 is a mystery and therefore something i would like to play with.
but they do not pop up often and they are expensive when they do.
we shall see...
joe
FrankS
Registered User
back alley said:
Smiling smugly.
Congrats, Joe.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
the 35/ 1.5 is a good lens Joe, not as contrasty as the 35/2 though, esp. at the largest f stop.
VictorM.
Well-known
There was a well-used 35/1.5 that went for about $135 last week.
back alley
IMAGES
xayraa33 said:
sounds like you know this from experience, tell me more please...
pacific rim has an excellent + 35/3.2 for $250.
joe
back alley
IMAGES
VictorM. said:
was that the really dirty looking one?
joe
> i'm understanding those 50's collectors a bit better now.
35F1.5. Cool. I want one. And I have not even got a shot back from the F1.8.
But the Summitar is Looking Good!
35F1.5. Cool. I want one. And I have not even got a shot back from the F1.8.
But the Summitar is Looking Good!
F
Frank Granovski
Guest
Is it super sharp and bokehful
back alley
IMAGES
Frank Granovski said:Is it super sharp and bokehful
i don't really give a flying flip about bokeh!!
it has to be the most dumb thing we talk about here.
the idea that people base their buying decisions, spending a ton of cash on a lens for it's out of focus rendering of a background amazes me to no end.
whew! sorry for the rant frank...
joe
F
Frank Granovski
Guest
Haha, but you didn't answer my questions!
I don't care about bokeh either. I just care about the super sharp part. That's why I own super sharp lenses and parted with the junk some time back. (Mostly Nikon and Olympus glass).
I don't care about bokeh either. I just care about the super sharp part. That's why I own super sharp lenses and parted with the junk some time back. (Mostly Nikon and Olympus glass).
Last edited:
back alley
IMAGES
well, the lens just arrived so i have not taken a photo with it yet. i hope to this weekend.
but i also don't fret over super sharpness either.
joe
but i also don't fret over super sharpness either.
joe
Another happy collector. Good going Joe, welcome to the group.
I have not bought a 50 in.... oh yeah, I have a J3 that just arrived from Brian. I have bought a 50 recently.
I have not bought a 50 in.... oh yeah, I have a J3 that just arrived from Brian. I have bought a 50 recently.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
well I have owned a 35/1.5 for the last 16 years, its not as contrasy as the 35/2, which is similar to the CV 35/1.7 which is amazing really, the Canon 35/2 came out in 1962 and the CV lens only a few years ago, the 35/2 still delivers a bit better colours (with colour film ) IMHO. But getting back to the 35/1.5, it is like the Canon 35/2.8 in contrast, at larger apertures, and almost 2 stops faster, it is very close to the look (bokeh too) you get with the Canon 50/1.4 at full bore. If you like that old timey look to your photos Joe, you can't better than the 35/1.5 for a hi-speed 35mm lens, IMHO, not a common lens, but one that is a little under rated and not mentioned very much. may be thats good, as the price would be much higher if people knew how good it is.
back alley
IMAGES
rover said:
i look forward to some of your shots with the j3 rover.
now that the 3.5 is here i can start on my informal comparsion of 35's.
joe