Trius
Waiting on Maitani
Please help me not buy this. It comes on a TC body (meter non-operative, which seems to be common), and in all the Googling I've done on the lens, it seems to get some high marks, even here on RFF. 
So do I need it? No. It's a cheap kit ($35USD), but I'd have to drive a bit or have it shipped. My thinking has been:
However, I don't need it, and the $35 could be banked towards a Barnack or M/ZI-M.
Please someone tell me it's not worth the time and effort!
So do I need it? No. It's a cheap kit ($35USD), but I'd have to drive a bit or have it shipped. My thinking has been:
- The pancake design makes a really compact package on the small TC body
- Most reports (though not all) say it's very sharp
- There are reports of some bokeh unpleasantness at certain apertures ... I like good bokeh, but am not a bokeh freak
- It seems to be pretty easy to modify to fit other mounts, especially 4/3s. If that's the case, it would probably even work on an OM.
- I could sell it on for the same or even a bit of profit if I wanted to
However, I don't need it, and the $35 could be banked towards a Barnack or M/ZI-M.
Please someone tell me it's not worth the time and effort!
FrankS
Registered User
Earl, I'll trade you my Konica FS-1 with a 40mm pancake lens, for a bottle of Trius wine.
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
Done deal!
FrankS
Registered User
See you at our next TO/GTA RFF meet up.
Robin P
Well-known
Yes it is sharp but is prone to flare when the sun is just outside the frame - this means a good hood is necessary which of course negates the attraction of the pancake dimensions.
Cheers, Robin
Cheers, Robin
pesphoto
Veteran
Ive had one for a few months, it's a great lens. Use it on an FS-1 body. I mostly shoot high iso and stop down, not a big fan of Out of focus backgrounds.
MaxElmar
Well-known
Konica TC was my first SLR circa 1977 - took another 15 years to get the 40 after my original 50/1.7 hexanon wore out. The 40 has stayed on there since! Great little lens. (And I wish I still had my 28/1.8 UC !)
pesphoto
Veteran
Here is a recent pic with the 40 1.8
I find the 40mm just right as 35mm is a bit too wide for me and it gives a bit more than 50mm.
I find the 40mm just right as 35mm is a bit too wide for me and it gives a bit more than 50mm.

shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Done deal!
Body-wise, the T4 and FT-1 are the ones to get. FT-1 is famous for non-working battery contact, so check it first.
Lens-wise, you'll like 35/2, 50/1.4, and (surprise!) 80-200/4 UC zoom (make sure it has UC on the front, otherwise it's the inferior version).
kuzano
Veteran
Konica 40/1.8 on Panny L1 w/proper hood
Konica 40/1.8 on Panny L1 w/proper hood
Don't know if this will work.. but:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pana_L1_w_Konica_40mm_and_hood.jpg
If not, go to this link:
http://forum.fourthirdsphoto.com/showthread.php?t=47137
My L1 is crying out for this look, and the results I read about. I use an OM Zuiko legacy 50/1.4 on the camera and am quite pleased. I really like the analog functions on the Panasonic L1
Konica 40/1.8 on Panny L1 w/proper hood
Don't know if this will work.. but:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pana_L1_w_Konica_40mm_and_hood.jpg
If not, go to this link:
http://forum.fourthirdsphoto.com/showthread.php?t=47137
My L1 is crying out for this look, and the results I read about. I use an OM Zuiko legacy 50/1.4 on the camera and am quite pleased. I really like the analog functions on the Panasonic L1
Robin P
Well-known
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.