50/1.1 Knock Your Socks Off Nokton at CameraQuest

is this going to be a limited edition lens?

the oz distributor seems to think it is.

I heard nothing about it being a limited edition. Could be that they limit it to how many they can sell - and that should be a lot at $1149!!!!!
 
Thanks for the review. Could you give us an idea of size and weight? How does it feel, say, compared to the 35/1.2, or the Konica 50/1.2?

It does feel about the same size as the 35f1.2. I did not really compare it to anything except with a Noctilux. All I can say is that I felt very comfortable with it - did fit either the ZM or the M2 fine. Balanced reasonably well (it is 475 gram after all - you know it is on the camera!).
Smaller and more compact than the Hexanon 60f1.2 that I used to have. Cant remember the "feel" of the 50f1.2 - but probably similar or smaller in size.
 
I think this is a cruel trick on Cosina's part for those who were already sweating over the folder and 'could they or couldn't they' stretch their finances to buy it. :p
 
Last edited:
If any of you need to raise some cash, have some gear to sell, and live along the Southern I-85 corridor... KEH is having a gear buying event next weekend, May 29 & 30, at their Atlanta office.

I have nothing of value that I don't use so I'll just keep saving my lunch money change. :)
 
Well I like the performance very much and as a former owner of a E58 Noctilux for several years. I would say..yes this new lens is a better deal and perfromer over the "Nocti" and price is several thousand dollars better than Leica. A real value added product and Mr. Kobayashi deserves 2 thumbs way up! I would expect to order a lens. I would perfer to put this on my M5 body.
Do you or Stephen know if it will fit ?? I enjoyed the photos very much and they reflect the quality of the lens. All the best....Laurance
 
I would expect to order a lens. I would perfer to put this on my M5 body.
Do you or Stephen know if it will fit ?? I enjoyed the photos very much and they reflect the quality of the lens. All the best....Laurance

To date all CV Leica M mount lenses have been M5 compatible, I would expect the new 50/1.1 to be no different.

Stephen
 
wow...fast answer about M5

wow...fast answer about M5

To date all CV Leica M mount lenses have been M5 compatible, I would expect the new 50/1.1 to be no different.

Stephen

Wow great news...Now I really am motivated. I have a Zeiss Sonnar 1.5 and it is great. But this new 50 has a different "signature" style and so for me a "New Brush" for my film canvas.
Also I find certain "F Stops" really shine different lenses of the same focal length..but different "filters". I can see this lens as being a true wide open superstar. Thanks again.
 
Are there any shots available that were taken with the 1.1 on a digital body? M8 or G1. Any evidence of focus shift with this lens?
 
The "bokeh mess" has more to do with the subject matter than the lens characteristics. It is shot across a display of dolls of varying size - distance to the far end edge is about 15-18 feet and the flower in the foreground is 1 meter away. The dolls were spaced unevenly and of slightly different size and will thus "blur" slightly odd.
Frankly, I am not interested in Bokeh per see as I consider it the "fuzzy stuff" that appears outside of what I focus on and is of limited interest to me. Could have been one reason why I never warmed to the 6 Noctiluxes I have owned (and the 0.95 Canon - which was almost all bokeh and nothing else). I am interested in the area I want sharp and the Nokton does very well there both at f1.1 and stopped down.

Good bokeh, in so far as I can tell, is all about not distracting from the subject. Of course some people actually like busy/messy bokeh, double-lines, bright rings, swirls etc; I suspect these people are right-brain thinkers and that my bad is their good. For people like me we want the bokeh to be a natural backdrop that gets out of the way of the photo. So I also am not interested in bokeh per se but I am very interested in things that distract from my subject.
 
hint: I need such a lens for a lens test.

Maybe Stephen listens and gets soft ......................
 
Is there a typographic error in the page:

"f/1 to f/16 with half stop click stops"
 
Last edited:
Is there a typographic error in the page:

"f/1 to f/16 with half stop click stops"

Yes I noticed that as well.

How much of a difference is 0.1 of an f-stop value exposure wise? Is it negligable, and can be just exposed at f/1 on an exposure meter?
 
Back
Top Bottom