raid
Dad Photographer
Such discussions will end this thread soon .... 🙁
It's likely to see Steve Huff write one....
My, my, my, that was quite different before I refreshed the page.
Hi,
Not politics but...
To sell in the USA they have to have the country of origin on them don't they? (It was/is a good way of dating things to before or after 1871.) Can anyone say where they are made as I must have missed it somewhere and can't be bothered to re-read it all.
I know some of the original Jupiter-3's were made by KMZ but I'm not too sure about this modern one.
Regards, David
...+1.
Personally, I don't demand an abstract technical perfection from a lens (in fact I think that's probably why I don't have much feeling for lenses from the last 10 years or so) I just mostly don't like "surprises" when I'm working. Consistency in focus is a lot better than sharpness or resolution. I mean there's a limit to that example, of course, but something functioning the same way every time has a greater value for me than a particular "look". It is nice to have a wide variety of options though.
Which we can predict will read:
OMG!!! This is the [one of the] best lens[es] ever! Sure it doesn't score well on resolution tests, but if you have THE FIRE IN YOUR BELLY or know what the kids are doing on the ART SCENE, you understand that sometimes technical stuff has to take a BACK SEAT to AESTHETICS!
D
![]()
Lomography doesn't say what that naugahyde binder is supposed to be. Any ideas?
My guess: a special place to write down how artsy I am.
Also, what deeper knowledge and ecstatic truth is contained within those thick pamphlets, I wonder?
Which we can predict will read:
OMG!!! This is the [one of the] best lens[es] ever! Sure it doesn't score well on resolution tests, but if you have THE FIRE IN YOUR BELLY or know what the kids are doing on the ART SCENE, you understand that sometimes technical stuff has to take a BACK SEAT to AESTHETICS!
D
I could probably find Japanese Sonnar copy (Nikon or Canon), for lower price, but I personally favor 0.7m min focus quite big time over 1m for versatility. C-Sonnar could focus down, but no LTM compatibility.
The Nikon 50 1.4 in LTM mount (Nippon Kogaku Tokyo) will focus down to 1.5 feet but you will naturally need preview on your camera to use the close focus range.
(sorry for going off-topic)
Interesting. I wasn't aware of that. Do you know if the RF coupling can go down to 0.7m (so M body can focus down to the body side of minimum focus distance limit).
Which we can predict will read:
OMG!!! This is the [one of the] best lens[es] ever! Sure it doesn't score well on resolution tests, but if you have THE FIRE IN YOUR BELLY or know what the kids are doing on the ART SCENE, you understand that sometimes technical stuff has to take a BACK SEAT to AESTHETICS!
D