semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
Version IV (tabbed, current optical formula).
There is an interesting tid-bit of tech info reg. your comment on aperture blades, Cal.
When you shoot closed down against a strong highlight, your picture will show a star pattern around the highlight. Or corners in the OOF around highlights. For an even number of aperture blades, the number of corners is the same as the number of aperture blades. For an odd number of aperture blades, the number of corners is twice the number of blades. Meaning 11 vs. 10 blades can make a huge difference.
🙂
Thanks everyone, received a Cron this morning and couldnt resist to snap some test shots during lunch.
Bokeh can be nice at f2 but I fear I will lust for something faster sooner or later... 🙄
![]()
![]()
Nokton 1.5
![]()
I own a Rigid Cron. Besides the nice Bokeh there is this smoothness to the OOF that is very painterly. In comparision, I say the DR Cron probably takes this further with its closer focus.
As far as having a lens to shoot only wide open or stopped down only one stop, my favorite is the CV 50/2.0 Nickel Heliar. While the 35/2.0 V.4 Bokeh King, 75/1.4 Lux V.3, and 50/2.0 Rigid Cron that I own all have ten blade aperatures, the Voightlander Nickel Heliar has eleven blades on its diaphram. The OOF is so smooth that some people have mistakenly critisized this lens to be soft wide open, but it isn't IMHO. In this manner I judge the smoothness of the OOF areas to be greater than my 50 rigid, so great that the 50/2.0 Nickel Heliar got a bad reputation. The Nickel Heliar wide open is pretty distinguished, but when you add the creative element of flare when my 50 Rigid is used, both are keepers.
Cal