A Love Letter to the Nikon F: Almost 70 years of Analog History and why I still shoot it daily.

Local time
8:26 PM
Joined
Mar 24, 2026
Messages
2
Location
Germany
Hi everyone,

Today it’s about the OG - the Nikon F. Even in 2026, with all the hype around newer film cameras, there’s something about the brick with its 100% viewfinder thats just super appealing to me.

I’ve put together a massive guide/review because I noticed a lot of the info out there is 10+ years old and doesn't account for current prices, modern battery solutions for the Photomic finders, or finding a reliable CLA service today.
A few things I covered:
  • The "Prism Rot" issue: What to look for before buying.
  • Non-AI Lenses: Why these are the best-kept secret for budget-conscious shooters (the 105mm f/2.5 is a dream).
  • The "Nikon Shuffle": A quick tip for those struggling with the film loading quirk.

If you're looking to pick one up or just want to see some high-res scans and a technical breakdown, you can check it out here:

I’d love to hear from fellow F shooters—do you prefer the clean Eye-level finder or the bulky Photomic look? I’m a Photomic boy but am thinking about getting that sleek simple finder just for the sake of it.

Cheers!
 

Attachments

  • Nikon-F-best-lenses-accessoires-focusing-screen-Benedikt-Schlereth-2.jpg
    Nikon-F-best-lenses-accessoires-focusing-screen-Benedikt-Schlereth-2.jpg
    431.4 KB · Views: 20
  • Nikon-F-best-lenses-accessoires-focusing-screen-Benedikt-Schlereth-7.jpg
    Nikon-F-best-lenses-accessoires-focusing-screen-Benedikt-Schlereth-7.jpg
    440.5 KB · Views: 16
For what it's worth, AI generated slop like this is why I no longer participate in this forum.
And yet, here you are commenting....

What makes you think this is AI generated? I note the poster appears to be a native German speaker, so I'm going to cut him a lot of slack if he needed assistance with the English.
 
I just read Benedikt's writeup -- very little to quibble with! I would however suggest a couple of modifications/additions to the lens list. I'd go with the 35/2.8 -- excellent lens and very cheap (because it's a slow-ish 35). And I'd add the 200/4, especially one of the early versions with the smaller focusing ring and the large amount of chrome on the barrel -- a lovely piece of mechanical-optical equipment.

Regarding the metered finder -- having to remove it to get at the battery compartment is a chore -- you need a strong thumbnail or maybe a screwdriver to push on the rear release (while pushing on the front release at the same time).

The batteries -- I don't know why Benedikt doesn't mention simply using alkaline 625 batteries and adjusting the film speed one stop -- set it to 200 for 400 speed film. Yes, I know all about the uneven voltage of alkalines, but really this is not a big deal.

About setting the film speed: I only have experience with non-CLE'ed finders, but I find it very difficult to pull up and twist the film speed dial. I mean, very difficult. I think it partly is due to the ridges on the dial being vertical (coined is the term, I think). The F2, with horizontal ridges, is a dream by comparison.

Both the F and F2 are great, but as an everyday use camera, it's the F2 for me all the way.
 

Thread viewers

Back
Top Bottom