N.delaRua
Well-known
Well to much of a mineralist we would have to devolve into bacteria...
I think that being concerned for the suffering of other beings is one of the most admirable concerns of which I can think.
Not entirely inaccurate. I'm not sure that they raised their own cattle but I'm pretty sure that (for example) cows raised with a high-mustard diet produced natural sensitizers (high sulphur compounds), so the gelatine is very tightly controlled.
...
What has always puzzled me, and struck me as quite unjust, is that while pork sausages contain pork and beef sausages contain beef, vegetarian sausages are not required by law to contain any vegetarians whatsoever.
Cheers,
R.
I remember reading a long time ago that the film manufacturers regarded beef from a certain area as the best, and preferred it. I either didn't know or forgot that it was due to mustard in the grass.
True. But "avoiding suffering" can also embrace "a good life and a quick and painless death".I think that being concerned for the suffering of other beings is one of the most admirable concerns of which I can think.
. . .
Also, why is a fluffy bunny "worth" more than a tree? If you're a vitalist, believing that all life is sacred, then they're both alive and both sacred.
Cheers,
R.
Then again, there are some people whose brains could best be used by rendering them down for the tiny amount of gelatine they contain, because they are never going to be used for thinking.I believe, people should be encouraged to use their brain. There are hardly any black and white decisions one can make that relate to ethics. For example, if you are truly against killing animals, then why do you tolerate other animals killing each other - therefore, what would be the solution, kill all the predators, or leave all animals alone? And if you decide to kill the predating animals, why then not kill all non vegan people? And if not kill the people, then why kill the animals? The choice has to be a compromise between your ideas about good and bad, the liberty of others, the law and above all, the common sense.
The point is that she was sitting in a car then made someone doubt about her own point so that he would then use a computer to ask RFFers about what she said re. films made with animal gelatin.What's your point?
You didn't offer the film for her to eat did you?
I think that being concerned for the suffering of other beings is one of the most admirable concerns of which I can think.
http://kaykeys.net/spirit/buddhism/tonglen.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/waylon-lewis/pema-chodron-how-to-do-to_b_278213.html
Carpooling with a vegan??? Doesn't she know that the petrol/diesel/LPG used to power the car is also made from dead animals? Just because they died millions of years ago, and didn't have very many cells, doesn't mean they wanted to be burnt so the vegan can get to work.
😉