a Vote for the "worst" word used in the RFF in 2006

My pet hates are acronyms. To be frank, not all of them. IMHO has a nice ring to it. And GAS is funny. But AFAIK is lazy; YMMV, infuriating (it took me some time to figure it out, esp. as I wasn't aware of the expression); WYSIWYG, just unbelievable. And WTR posted above - I still haven't worked that one out.

DYKWIM?
 
telenous said:
My pet hates are acronyms. To be frank, not all of them. IMHO has a nice ring to it. And GAS is funny. But AFAIK is lazy; YMMV, infuriating (it took me some time to figure it out, esp. as I wasn't aware of the expression); WYSIWYG, just unbelievable. And WTR posted above - I still haven't worked that one out.

DYKWIM?
Click to expand...
WRT = With respect to...

WYSIWYG = What you see is what you get...a perfectly respectable acronym of ancient lineage, originally refering to a type of word processor (e.g. Word) where the screen is visually identical to the printed output. This is as opposed to a "mark up language", like HTML, where a computer process the markup to render the visual output.

Regards,
Ira
 
Magenta is a good one
Click to expand...

So's Columbia! 🙂 🙂 🙂

minty
Click to expand...

Seriously, that one makes me sick! Sounds like a commercial for a mouthwash. E-bay's contribution to our vocabulary, tres annoying.

Speaking of annoying, I don't mind "mint" or "minty" as much as "L@@K, LQQK, or R@RE". {_gag_}

What is the etymology of "Bokeh"?
Click to expand...

Japanese, supposedly. However, a friend of mine who is Japanese had never heard of it before I told her.

And how, exactly, does one pronounce it?
Click to expand...

I mostly hear it pronounced "bow-ka", rhyming with polka, but I've heard it also pronounced "boke", rhyming with poke, and also with the second syllable truncated by those trying to sound artsy-f*rtsy. 🙂
 
Topdog1 said:
WRT = With respect to...

WYSIWYG = What you see is what you get...a perfectly respectable acronym of ancient lineage, originally refering to a type of word processor (e.g. Word) where the screen is visually identical to the printed output. This is as opposed to a "mark up language", like HTML, where a computer process the markup to render the visual output.

Regards,
Ira
Click to expand...

I am sure you are right. Still these acronyms are not entirely obvious to non-native speakers and/or computer-language-phobic photographers. It is always a nice gesture to write longhand, and I say this as someone who works in an academic field where such courtesies are rarely extended, much to the suffering of everyone involved.

Best,
 
telenous said:
I am sure you are right. Still these acronyms are not entirely obvious to non-native speakers and/or computer-language-phobic photographers. It is always a nice gesture to write longhand, and I say this as someone who works in an academic field where such courtesies are rarely extended, much to the suffering of everyone involved.

Best,
Click to expand...
I'm sure you are correct about this, too. Consider it part of the argot of the blogosphere and the creeping digitization of all things, including photography and discourse. :bang:

/Ira
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom