Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Fascinating. Why is "bokeh" a bad word?
Nachkebia
Well-known
M8 (very personal)
peterc
Heretic
I guess it's subjective ... like bokeh. Why not call it what it is ... out of focus?Gabriel M.A. said:Fascinating. Why is "bokeh" a bad word?
Peter
gareth
Established
Fascinating. Why is "bokeh" a bad word?
I can't say I like the word much, but then again it's handy that there is such a word.
Why don't I like it? Perhaps because it seems a little too close to the Scots word for vomit, which is bowk.
VictorM.
Well-known
'finished' 
telenous
Well-known
My pet hates are acronyms. To be frank, not all of them. IMHO has a nice ring to it. And GAS is funny. But AFAIK is lazy; YMMV, infuriating (it took me some time to figure it out, esp. as I wasn't aware of the expression); WYSIWYG, just unbelievable. And WTR posted above - I still haven't worked that one out.
DYKWIM?
DYKWIM?
Topdog1
Well-known
What is the etymology of "Bokeh"?
And how, exactly, does one pronounce it?
/Ira
And how, exactly, does one pronounce it?
/Ira
telenous
Well-known
Topdog1 said:"Bokeh"?
And how, exactly, does one pronounce it?
/Ira
With great difficulty
PS. Here's an article from Mike Johnston, who is apparently (at least) partly responsible for the neologism.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-04-04-04.shtml
Last edited:
Topdog1
Well-known
WRT = With respect to...telenous said:My pet hates are acronyms. To be frank, not all of them. IMHO has a nice ring to it. And GAS is funny. But AFAIK is lazy; YMMV, infuriating (it took me some time to figure it out, esp. as I wasn't aware of the expression); WYSIWYG, just unbelievable. And WTR posted above - I still haven't worked that one out.
DYKWIM?
WYSIWYG = What you see is what you get...a perfectly respectable acronym of ancient lineage, originally refering to a type of word processor (e.g. Word) where the screen is visually identical to the printed output. This is as opposed to a "mark up language", like HTML, where a computer process the markup to render the visual output.
Regards,
Ira
350D_user
B+W film devotee
... or blurred background?peterc said:I guess it's subjective ... like bokeh. Why not call it what it is ... out of focus?
Peter
dmr
Registered Abuser
Magenta is a good one
So's Columbia!
minty
Seriously, that one makes me sick! Sounds like a commercial for a mouthwash. E-bay's contribution to our vocabulary, tres annoying.
Speaking of annoying, I don't mind "mint" or "minty" as much as "L@@K, LQQK, or R@RE". {_gag_}
What is the etymology of "Bokeh"?
Japanese, supposedly. However, a friend of mine who is Japanese had never heard of it before I told her.
And how, exactly, does one pronounce it?
I mostly hear it pronounced "bow-ka", rhyming with polka, but I've heard it also pronounced "boke", rhyming with poke, and also with the second syllable truncated by those trying to sound artsy-f*rtsy.
AusDLK
Famous Photographer
No surprise here... M8.
MinorTones
Well-known
Gabriel M.A. said:I'm going to have to go with "aperature".
That makes me cringe and think a few choice words after I say "it's aperture!"
Runner-up? "censored"
I made this mistake once :angel:
My vote goes to PRISTINE
-Mitch
telenous
Well-known
Topdog1 said:WRT = With respect to...
WYSIWYG = What you see is what you get...a perfectly respectable acronym of ancient lineage, originally refering to a type of word processor (e.g. Word) where the screen is visually identical to the printed output. This is as opposed to a "mark up language", like HTML, where a computer process the markup to render the visual output.
Regards,
Ira
I am sure you are right. Still these acronyms are not entirely obvious to non-native speakers and/or computer-language-phobic photographers. It is always a nice gesture to write longhand, and I say this as someone who works in an academic field where such courtesies are rarely extended, much to the suffering of everyone involved.
Best,
pesphoto
Veteran
how about "colour"
FrankS
Registered User
I know it as boe-kay. That's like "okay" with a "b" in front.
Rafael
Mandlerian
What's wrong with "colour"?
Topdog1
Well-known
I'm sure you are correct about this, too. Consider it part of the argot of the blogosphere and the creeping digitization of all things, including photography and discourse. :bang:telenous said:I am sure you are right. Still these acronyms are not entirely obvious to non-native speakers and/or computer-language-phobic photographers. It is always a nice gesture to write longhand, and I say this as someone who works in an academic field where such courtesies are rarely extended, much to the suffering of everyone involved.
Best,
/Ira
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
Hyacinth Bokeh?
Chris
Chris
rschneider
FKA rolopix
M8
The defense of the indefensible is getting old. . .
rs
The defense of the indefensible is getting old. . .
rs
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.