venchka
Veteran
There's a larger point here: Sony E mount cameras don't really care what lens is mounted.
Think about it: here's a camera with a flange to sensor (film) distance thin enough that you can put a Leica thread lens and adapter on to it.
That's not an accident, it was designed that way.
The LTM is the thinnest lens mount made in wide use.
Therefore the E mount will handle almost any lens BY DESIGN.
Pretty nifty.
Correction: The Leica M mount is thinner than the LTM. Otherwise, you couldn't attach LTM lenses to M mount cameras. That was no accident. Neither was Canon's decision to make the EOS camera mount thicker than the BL-FD mount. The old lenses didn't fit on the newer cameras. Thanks Canon!
Now, back to our regular programming.
We have seen a 19mm Mega Expensive Leitz-R lens and a moderately priced 20mm Canon FD lens on a Sony A7R. Terrific results.
Still pondering:
1961 50mm/2.0 Dual Range Summicron on either Sony FF bodies. We have one YES! and one NO! vote that I know of. Both answers can't be right.
Konica 35mm/2.0 UC-Hexanon. Is it possible that the A7 (24 Mp) will play nice with the UC-Hexanon where the A7R will not?
1956 Nikkor 50/1.4. It obviously works. Has anyone tried the 18" minimum focus distance built into that lens? I would appreciate f-stops less than 1.4. Not all of us use lenses wide open all the time.
Waiting for Canon BL-FD results for 24/2.8, 35/2.0, 50/1.4, 50/1.8 and 50/3.5 Macro.
Canon EOS-EF lens samples would be nice. My 17-35/2.8 L lens on either Sony body would be awesome. Alas, it was built prior to 2006. So, no auto focus with the Metabones adapter. However, will the Metabones adapter operate the aperture (stop down) on older EOS-EF lenses??????
Thanks! Keep the information flowing. 😉
Wayne










