cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Actually I'd take another M6 if I could, .72, yeah...
Key word is if I could, it's not a neccesaty and won't happen, but If I could have one more piece of rangefinder gear that would be it.
It's not GAS though, it would just be a luxury thing.
Key word is if I could, it's not a neccesaty and won't happen, but If I could have one more piece of rangefinder gear that would be it.
It's not GAS though, it would just be a luxury thing.
A good reason not to be "done."FrankS said:
Lens might be a bit short, though, for pro portraits, about the same angle of view as 43mm in the small format. I guess I shouldn't assume head'n'shoulders as a portrait, as this lens would be fine for waist-up and couples, just considering 4-6 ft as a working distance.I'm surprised not to have become fond of my GW670III. I wish it had AE, I don't care for the tinny "plink" of the shutter release (I guess it's actually the actuation counter), or the indistinct fuzzy RF patch. And while film frame spacing seems fine on 120 film, with 220 it's irritatingly variable.
Nice large controls with legible labeling, nice VF framelines. Big luscious neg size but all-in-all I'm much happier using the Bronica RF645. For 6x7 I'm delighted with the easy-handling Pentax 67II, which, by the way, is a most versatile platform for portraiture.
Certainly more room for not-doneness out there!