Accessorizing: Now We're In For It...

[amateriat]

I'm not sure whether to laugh out loud or cringe at this one...

(Yes, yes, stop me if you've heard this one, etc.) 🙄


- Barrett

 

[40oz]

That's either funny or sad. Depends on the user. I'm voting mostly sad. On the other hand, it's probably better than a solid pink skin. Is it sadder than buying a phone knowing you are going to then buy a "skin" or "armor" or some other accessory because the maker did squat to produce a robust product but yet you still bought it?

I think it's like the plastic seat covers in cars in the 70's or plastic couch covers. WTF did you buy something you don't think can tolerate actual use as intended?

 

[RayPA]

I guess it's better than making a phone out of a Leica. It's definitely cheaper (imagine what Leica would charge for that!). 😛


/

 

[alistair.o]

Oh dear....

 

[HuubL]

I love it and would buy it if I had an iPhone ;-)

 

[swoop]

At $13 I'd buy one. But I don't like the idea of putting sticky things on my stuff. I had one of those "removable decals" on my iPod years ago and when I went to take it off it left an extremely nasty layer of residue all over the thing.

 

[Paul Luscher]

I've heard of imitation being the sincerest form of flattery, but that's ridiculous

 

[photogdave]

What a great way to draw unwanted attention to your phone! Anti-stealth!
Maybe for an extra $2 they'll throw in the black masking tape to cover the red dot.

 

[PMCC]

You guys have been asking for a $13 digital Leica, and now that there is one, all you do is b*tch.

 

[alexnotalex]

This is really cool. The Nikon SP one rocks harder though, imho

 

[sevres_babylone]

I guess the Panasonic won't cut it then 🙂
http://panasonic.jp/mobile/lumixphone/

 

[ebino]

nothing defines mainstream like an iPhone, hence an iphone with a retro looking camera cover means, retro looking cameras have gone mainstream.