Accidently exposed an entire roll of film twice... Results.

Gregoryniss

Well-known
Local time
5:10 PM
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Messages
216
So Accidently lost an exposed roll of film with the rest of my unexposed film... don't ask how it happened lol. Ended up I shot an entire roll of film twice through, so everything was perfectly lined up and double exposed. The double exposures were shot a week a part, and i'm surprised at how many of the coincidentally work out to be quite interesting. An unfortunate blessing? What do you think about them? Here are the ones that I think turned out well, errr interesting would be a more appropriate word choice haha

1
4684203807_879ea39723_b.jpg

2
4684206805_60a9c4a45e_b.jpg

3
4684209797_cd216ff8f8_b.jpg

4
4684214285_435df59a08_b.jpg

5
4684853416_2b6460ab11_b.jpg

6
4684858556_0d1a6dc455_b.jpg

7
4684858766_0707b4d22e_b.jpg

8
4684863044_fb58372a21_b.jpg

9
4684867042_b2dfdc80d5_b.jpg

10
4684871068_230e8857e5_b.jpg
 
yes, these 'mistakes' can turn out pretty funky. while 5,6,7 look especially cool to me, most of these shots look like they were taken through a reflecting window! happy accidents indeed!

about 1.5 years back, I accidentally exposed one frame 3 or 4 times at a concert (film slipped out of the sprocked holes after loading, don't ask me how):
3297843804_706411f652.jpg


I noticed it though, rewound the film and finished it 1-2 months later, discovering this. :D
 
Last edited:
Simon... that photo is AMAZING. Thanks guys! I'm 50/50 on if i'm upset about ruining what i thought was 48 individual pictures that I spent time creating, and excited about how some of the double exposures turned out haha.
 
Simon... that photo is AMAZING. Thanks guys! I'm 50/50 on if i'm upset about ruining what i thought was 48 individual pictures that I spent time creating, and excited about how some of the double exposures turned out haha.

thank you!
I think that's just what you feel like when these things happen, probably why so few people do this kind of experiment on purpose :angel:

maybe you should wind your film all the way back into the capsule, so the difference between exposed and unexposed film is clearer?
 
Interesting - - and opens up some possibilities. I saw a folio some time ago of shots by a NZ photographer named Jackie Rankin who deliberately double exposed her shots. She previsualised and planned but the results were intriguing and not "happy accidents".
Now that you've had this experience, how about trying to push the concept further and maybe emulate some of the work that Jackie shows here - http://www.jackieranken.co.nz/
 
Some look like shots taken through a window plus picking up the background. There are a couple where the subject face is missing is pretty cool/weird.
 
The famous Rock photographer Jim Marshall used to double-expose concert rolls, he would do this intentionally. There are some cool double exposures in TRUST, one of his last books.
 
Haven't done that in years, but I have done it. I've also forgotten whether I exposed a roll (didn't) and ended up with blanks.

My trick now is that when I remove exposed film, I fold and crease the leader, so I know not to load it again.
 
Some of these accidental double exposures are amazing! What did that guy who used to paint landscapes on PBS say? Happy accidents?
 
I think this happens to lots of people eventually -- always fascinating, but it's a big bonus when there's a real keeper or two, as you have. I'll join the chorus of "great!" on #5!

Here's the best frame (actually a frame and a half since the two were not perfectly aligned) from when this happened to me last.

4177133759_c0f5b4e39b_o.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom