literiter
Well-known
In 1936, the Kodak model 118 was a pocket-able 35mm camera. On the right.
In 2001, the Ricoh GR1v was a pocket-able 35mm camera. On the left.
Look at the viewfinders!
In 2001, the Ricoh GR1v was a pocket-able 35mm camera. On the left.
Look at the viewfinders!
literiter
Well-known
Comparison up close from the front.
literiter
Well-known
Comparison of viewfinders from the back....where you look through.
literiter
Well-known
The GR1v's viewfinder must be a whole 1/8th inch larger that the Retina's viewfinder.
Where will we be with viewfinder technology in another 60, or so years I wonder?
Is there a viewfinder out there that really shows the subject?
Where will we be with viewfinder technology in another 60, or so years I wonder?
Is there a viewfinder out there that really shows the subject?
thegman
Veteran
I guess in those two cases, the Ricoh one looks better, but I there have probably been more regressions in that area than advances. The fact that most DSLRs are not full frame means the finders are smaller than what came before in 35mm.
Most digital cameras don't even have finders any more, we're supposed to look at a shiny screen in broad daylight and act like it's an improvement. Bah.
Most digital cameras don't even have finders any more, we're supposed to look at a shiny screen in broad daylight and act like it's an improvement. Bah.
Archlich
Well-known
Does the Kodak finder have illuminated frame lines, three-step parallax compensation, distance indicator and focus point & shutter speed display as with the Ricoh one?
Sejanus.Aelianus
Veteran
All good points.
literiter
Well-known
No, it doesn't.......but if it did you wouldn't be able to see them any better than you can see them on the GR1v.