k__43
Registered Film User
... in a few months - yes.
Fotoimpex still sells their last 1000 rolls of the old version.
the new price is interesting .. I'm going to pass on this. I know the previous price was probably way too low but I'm not paying that much for it.
k__43
Registered Film User
Yes, not that hard to find a decent 35mm 100 ISO film.
But I miss APX100 in 120 and sheet...![]()
where did you get it in those formats in the last 3 years?
clayne
shoot film or die
where did you get it in those formats in the last 3 years?
Gotta look hard, man.
Some of us went deep, very deep, into APX bunker years ago knowing these days would be here. I scrounge APX in 120 and 4x5 when I can.
haempe
Well-known
Nowhere... but it still hurts.where did you get it in those formats in the last 3 years?
k__43
Registered Film User
Heh heh Silvermax is APX 100.
yeah I figured, some sort of older version tho. I developed a silvermax and an APX roll in the same tank and the silvermax seemed a tiny bit thin. I'd rate it 80 for the same dev times in Rodinal.
Rangefinderfreak
Well-known
Another "game to find the truth" in what Fotoimpex is saying... When was it that they said their 400 Iso film is "just around the corner"...
( a year, two years... three years ?)
( a year, two years... three years ?)
haempe
Well-known
In the link posted by the OP Mirko explains again, that they can't produce the 400 for a market compatible price.Another "game to find the truth" in what Fotoimpex is saying... When was it that they said their 400 Iso film is "just around the corner"...
( a year, two years... three years ?)
So the project is skipped...
Rangefinderfreak
Well-known
I think the truth and explanation is that they cannot afford the master roll that kentmere requires for "own brand" of 400 iso film. Maco has it in 35mm and 120... both in 100 iso and 400 iso versions...In the link posted by the OP Mirko explains again, that they can't produce the 400 for a market compatible price.
So the project is skipped...
haempe
Well-known
This implication is a little bit too mean for my taste...I think the truth and explanation is that they cannot afford the master roll that kentmere requires for "own brand" of 400 iso film. Maco has it in 35mm and 120... both in 100 iso and 400 iso versions...
But yes, the occurrence of Kentmere in the market has changed the situation.
ath
Well-known
IMO Lupus does with the APX line what they already have done with CN and slide film - selling a different film under the same designation.
joeswe
Well-known
No, and thats the problem.
How to keep the old one's (which is still around in the market) apart from the new's when using the same packing?
Processing times differ noticeably.
One can only hope they indicate the version in some kind...
Calm down, who says the packaging will be the same? The pictures linked in the post by Mirko are just random dummy pictures from their web shop, it is so plain obvious as the box still shows the original "Agfa" (not Agfaphoto) trademark which Lupus Media surely will not be allowed to use.
haempe
Well-known
Will do.Calm down...
joeswe
Well-known
I think the truth and explanation is that they cannot afford the master roll that kentmere requires for "own brand" of 400 iso film.
Forgive me for being blunt, but this is bull****. And what exactly is your agenda? Spreading FUD?
Fotoimpex have already developed their own emulsion ISO400 film, it was coated by INOVISCOAT and the first run actually started to sell through their web shop about two years ago, but the project was put on ice due to some technical/production related issues and because of being not economically viable at the moment.
So, the ISO400 (Adoxpan) project by Fotoimpex does exist and is part of a very difficult effort to bring new film products to market, and that alone is an achievement that is worth much more than anything that MACO has ever done, which is more or less simply rebadging, repackaging and reselling whatever material they are getting their hands on.
Merumeni
Established
What ever it will be - you have to pay 40 % more for the new stuff.
Insane!
Insane!
clayne
shoot film or die
What ever it will be - you have to pay 40 % more for the new stuff.
Insane!
Uh, this isn't the case.
Photo_Smith
Well-known
I used to use APX 400 a lot; this stuff cannot be the same, the Rodinal 1+50 time they list is DOUBLE the time the old version I used required. They're saying 21 minutes at 1+50? That's insane, I cannot think of any film by any manufacturer needing such a long developing time in Rodinal 1+50. APX 400 used to require 10 minutes.
Strangely enough Chris 21 mins at 1:50 in Rodinal is very similar to as the old APX 400 (pre 2003) and although it seems insane in fact matches Agfa recommendations for that film development combo in the 1980's and 90's
Here is a quick scan from a 1990's Rodinal data sheet.

So that time won't be considered insane by those of us old enough to remember the old APX 400 from the last century.
clayne
shoot film or die
Remember that APX400 went through 2 (actually 3 if you count AP400) versions prior to lupus.
ath
Well-known
Yes, before this new "NEW" there has already been a APX400NEW before Agfaphoto folded up.
Photo_Smith
Well-known
Yes I was aware of that, just reminding Chris that the version prior to 2003 needed 20 mins in Rodinal 1:50.
The 2003-demise version was different, there was a whole warehouse full of that stuff-not sure what Lupus have been selling recently, could be Mortsel, Wolfen or any other EU factory.
The 2003-demise version was different, there was a whole warehouse full of that stuff-not sure what Lupus have been selling recently, could be Mortsel, Wolfen or any other EU factory.
Merumeni
Established
Uh, this isn't the case.
March 2013 price : 2,61 EUR
new price : 3,81 EUR
hurts and makes pretty much 45 per cent increase.
Insane!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.