joe bosak
Well-known
If you have to ask for guidance, you don't really want it.
And I have decided to shoot pictures this fall with my film cameras, as well. I want to shoot at least one roll in every film camera I own. In fact I'm adding more film cameras: an M3 from Used Photo Pro; and a 3g from Japan--both in beautiful condition. So far, I have shot one roll in the 3g. I plan to develop and print once the weather gets too cold for outdoor comfort. So my inclination to avoid buying an M10 is partly to avoid the temptation of too much digital shooting. Or, as Tom A would have said, "Back to basics!"Wonder what AI would say about my plans to sell my M10 to get money for film. As my M10 has set on the shelf for 2 years I've decide to take it along with my Elmarit 21mm and Voightlander 75 2.5 LTM to an upcoming event held by Used PhotoPro to see what I can get for them. This will leave me with a M2, 28, 35, 50 and 85mm lens. For shooting wider than 28mm I bought a Nikon FM with a 24mm F 2.8 and will probable get a couple other lens to go with it. Kind of planning on using the M2 to shoot B&W film with while keeping the FM loaded with color film. Also have my Yashica Mat 124g when I want more resolution than the M2 or FM offers
Yes, an over-use of AI certainly could be a mistake. Too much of anything is no good. But I see no mistake in using AI to get a broad survey, sampling, and integration and summary of what has been said so far. From that starting point point, one can agree or disagree. It was helpful that AI pointed out that there are certain things I like about my M9 (true), and things I might dislike about an M10 (likely).From "AI, tell me what camera to use" to "AI, tell me what to photograph" it seems to be a small step in the "stop-thinking-for-yourself" development society is going through these days.
Yes it is true that young people don't read as much as they should. It is also true that AI can be a valuable tool, if used appropriately. I think these are separate issues. I don't think we have any post-literate people on RFF. There's nothing intellectual about refusing to use a useful tool, where it fits. See my note to Harry the K.
Moving from a Leica M9 to an M10 offers significant improvements in technical performance and modern handling, while sacrificing the M9's distinct CCD sensor "film-like" color rendering. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize modern usability and low-light performance over the nostalgic image character of the M9.
Pros of replacing an M9 with an M10
Feature
Improvement in the M10
- Low-light performance: The M10 's CMOS sensor provides drastically better high ISO performance, with usable images up to ISO 6400 or higher, compared to the M9 's practical limit of ISO 800-1600. The M10's images have less noise and better color retention at higher sensitivities.
- Dynamic range: The M10 offers a more versatile dynamic range, particularly in shadow recovery. This gives you more flexibility to adjust exposures in post-processing without losing detail.
- Ergonomics and build: The M10 is slightly slimmer and lighter than the M9, with a refined, film-M-like profile that many find more comfortable to handle. It also offers better weather sealing.
- Speed and responsiveness: The M10 has a larger, faster buffer and a more responsive Maestro II image processor, making continuous shooting less likely to cause camera lock-ups.
- Viewfinder: The M10 has a larger viewfinder with higher magnification, better eye relief, and 2m-optimized frame lines for more accurate framing and focusing.
🤔There is no specific IP (Ingress Protection) rating for the Leica M10, and it is not fully weather-sealed like Leica's more rugged SL-series cameras. However, Leica does state that the M10 has some degree of protection against dust and "light showers".
Official statements and reviews
- Leica's claims: On its website, Leica states that the M10 offers "further protection against light showers, dust and bad weather" via special rubber seals. It is not advertised as being "weather sealed" in the same way as cameras with a formal IP rating.
- Expert reviews: Many camera reviews confirm this level of water resistance. For example, Steve Huff's 2017 review noted that the M10 had seals to keep rain out and was improved over previous M models, but was still not designed for heavy downpours. Similarly, ExpertPhotography describes the camera as "pretty well weather sealed" but advises against standing in a downpour.
Right! The answer depends on how we ask the question. I was intentionally biasing AI to lean towards avoiding the M10; intending to later try going in the opposite direction. Here it is:Using the DuckDuckGo web browser configured to purge history and cookies whenever I close the app, I queried Google's AI in what I thought was a more neutral tone: "What are the pros and cons of replacing a Leica M9 camera with an M10?". Below is it's output. Interestingly, there's still the reference to "film like" CCD qualities, which I disagree with, but otherwise, the bullet points seem pretty objective.
What are the pros and cons of replacing a Leica M9 camera with an M10?
Overall, I much prefer this, save for iffy bits about potential for greater M10 noise at high ISO and potential for wifi connectivity issues, compared to M9 which simply doesn't offer extended ISO or any sort of wireless connectivity. It is technically correct, but kind of missing the point in these details.Here's a detailed comparison of replacing a Leica M9 with an M10:
Sensor and Image Quality
The M10 offers a 24 MP CMOS sensor compared to the M9's 18 MP CCD. This upgrade results in better resolution and improved high-ISO performance. Photographers shooting in low light will find the M10 significantly better.
Design and Ergonomics
The M10 is slimmer and more ergonomically designed, making it more comfortable for extended use. While some users might miss the bulk of the M9, the sleekness of the M10 is a welcome change for many.
Connectivity and Usability
The M10 includes built-in Wi-Fi, which allows for easier image sharing and transfer. This is a step up from the M9, which has very limited connectivity options.
Battery and Performance
The M10 has an improved battery life, allowing for more shooting before needing a charge. However, it utilizes a different battery than the M9, necessitating additional purchases if you switch.
Overall Considerations
Upgrading to the M10 brings numerous improvements, especially in image quality and usability. However, the changes come at a higher financial cost, and some users might prefer the nostalgic aspects of the M9.
Would you like to know more about any specific features or tech specs?