I don't really understand that, Bill. You've given up the freedom to fly in exchange for the freedom to avoid a security line? Each to our own, but that's a trade I wouldn't make.
I do not go voluntarily into places where I believe my civil liberties are being abused. The statement made was
"nothing you can do about it anyway" and I noted that there is something you can do about it, you can avoid putting yourself in that situation. I don't go into bad neighborhoods either, and for the same reason; I don't like what might happen to me there.
Everyone must make their own choices.
If I find myself in a situation where flying is the only option I have, I will grit my teeth and do it; as rogerchristian suggested, with a stupid vapid grin pasted across my face and a smile in my heart, every question answered with a cheery "Yes sir," the better to get through the torture chamber.
However, I exercise my right to choose less convenient methods of personal travel in all other circumstances. In the common parlance, screw 'em. If enough people drive or take the train instead of flying, the message will be sent. Continuing to bow down before oppressors on the basis that there is no choice is, to me, not worthy of free people.
I see the security lines as a hassle, not a deprivation of liberty.
I see the security lines as theater, designed to calm sheep, and a serious violation of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution. I realize the courts do not agree with me, so this is my own personal opinion. I have the courage of my convictions - I stay away from such places, since I lack the authority to make them stop it.
I am only sorry so many Americans are so willing to lick the hand that holds their chains.
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” - Samuel Adams