mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
It's kind of, well, obvious (duh!) but I only just realised that not only do I own a lot of old cameras, but that even the digital cameras I own (the ones I use, too!) are quite old.
The most recent camera I own (aside from my iPhone), which I kind of regard as 'new' (even though I've had mine nearly two years now), is a Canon 5D mark IV - and that model is from freakin' 2016!!
Seven years old!! Which in "digital camera years" (which I've kind of regarded like "dog years", only worse) is freakin' ancient! I'm not sure if this bugs me, or why it should if it does (I don't think it does). They still take photos just as well as they always did. I can still print from them as large as I care to, for the uses I make of each of them.
Yet, still, it somehow seems to be "a shock". I was also surprised, a bit, when I thought on this and counted the digital cameras I actually use - and came up with eight of them (including my iPhone). Eight, somehow, seems a lot - but I do indeed use them (I used "took photos with intent, in 2023" as a proxy for "still use them").
(I have plenty of other digital cameras, too. All older, but none really used anymore.)
If there is any reason for this (aside, maybe, from being a cheapskate) it’s that I'm something of an "optical finder bigot". I've never taken to EVFs - and that seems to be where all the action on new cameras is, these days. Maybe, perhaps, sometime, I should make the effort to look through a "really modern" EVF, since people keep saying "they're so much better than they used to be". But then: 'they' have always said that, and I've never found it to be true, so I probably won't bother. 🤷♂️
For what little it's worth, I put a album up on Flickr with a sample from each of the digital cameras I use (shots not previously put on Flickr, for the record) at:
www.flickr.com
...Mike
P.S. It could just be a case of “old guy, old cameras”. That does seem plausible 🤔😂
The most recent camera I own (aside from my iPhone), which I kind of regard as 'new' (even though I've had mine nearly two years now), is a Canon 5D mark IV - and that model is from freakin' 2016!!
Seven years old!! Which in "digital camera years" (which I've kind of regarded like "dog years", only worse) is freakin' ancient! I'm not sure if this bugs me, or why it should if it does (I don't think it does). They still take photos just as well as they always did. I can still print from them as large as I care to, for the uses I make of each of them.
Yet, still, it somehow seems to be "a shock". I was also surprised, a bit, when I thought on this and counted the digital cameras I actually use - and came up with eight of them (including my iPhone). Eight, somehow, seems a lot - but I do indeed use them (I used "took photos with intent, in 2023" as a proxy for "still use them").
(I have plenty of other digital cameras, too. All older, but none really used anymore.)
If there is any reason for this (aside, maybe, from being a cheapskate) it’s that I'm something of an "optical finder bigot". I've never taken to EVFs - and that seems to be where all the action on new cameras is, these days. Maybe, perhaps, sometime, I should make the effort to look through a "really modern" EVF, since people keep saying "they're so much better than they used to be". But then: 'they' have always said that, and I've never found it to be true, so I probably won't bother. 🤷♂️
For what little it's worth, I put a album up on Flickr with a sample from each of the digital cameras I use (shots not previously put on Flickr, for the record) at:

Even my digital cameras are old!
Sample shots from all the digital cameras I currently use ("currently" defined as "still used in 2023"). All of them are OLD...
...Mike
P.S. It could just be a case of “old guy, old cameras”. That does seem plausible 🤔😂
Last edited: