Almost Arrested Last Week, Chased Down Tonight

Chuck Albertson said:
Never apologize, never explain.
Click to expand...

I might agree with the not apologizing, but not explaining! I don't agree with. You should always be kind & ready to give an answer for what you are doing! Photographers get in trouble when they develop this superiority (cocky) attitude when confronted by someone, esp. police! We are living in a new day! People ARE living in fear! I feel sorry for them, but they do have as much right to ask what you are doing on the streets as we do taking photos on the streets. This isn't saying we should back down & let them win over you. I'm saying when you are confronted use your head. When you speak kindness you usually win!
 
Thank God I live in the great socialist, big government state of Canada. I've seen very little of this nonsense here in Toronto. Once, a PDO asked me to stop taking pictures of a film shoot. I was about to explain to him my rights, but decided it wasn't worth it. I walked around the corner, snapped my photo and that was it. On the weekends, I've seen amateurs walking around with big DSLRs dangling from their necks all over the city (and not just in touristy areas).

The problem you describe seems to be less "big brother" and more vigilante justice. I don't mean to slight my American friends (I'm half-American myself), but the news down there keeps people whipped into a constant state of anxiety (child abductions, terrorist attacks, illegal immigrants running across people's yards). Heck, even your president is a neo-Muslim-Marxist, non-citizen involved in a vast, decades longs conspiracy to...do something or other that's really bad. The irony of course is that people - North Americans in particular it seems - just love posting photos of themselves and their friends in all sorts of really compromising situations all over of the Internets, along with every scrap of personal information they can possibly type into their computer-machines. Lazy terrorists, kidnappers, etc., hardly need to do recon with a camera. All they need to do is use Google street view and join a dating site. And don't get me started on the security cameras that are going up all over the place (including here in Toronto). People on both sides of the border rail against the government further encroaching into our lives, but then demand that very same government keep us safe from any and all harm that could possibly befall us. Consistency, people! (Please - all of this is meant in gentle jest).
 
What a wonderful sense of humor!

What a wonderful sense of humor!

Crazy Funny...

rdeleskie said:
Thank God I live in the great socialist, big government state of Canada. I've seen very little of this nonsense here in Toronto. Once, a PDO asked me to stop taking pictures of a film shoot. I was about to explain to him my rights, but decided it wasn't worth it. I walked around the corner, snapped my photo and that was it. On the weekends, I've seen amateurs walking around with big DSLRs dangling from their necks all over the city (and not just in touristy areas).

The problem you describe seems to be less "big brother" and more vigilante justice. I don't mean to slight my American friends (I'm half-American myself), but the news down there keeps people whipped into a constant state of anxiety (child abductions, terrorist attacks, illegal immigrants running across people's yards). Heck, even your president is a neo-Muslim-Marxist, non-citizen involved in a vast, decades longs conspiracy to...do something or other that's really bad. The irony of course is that people - North Americans in particular it seems - just love posting photos of themselves and their friends in all sorts of really compromising situations all over of the Internets, along with every scrap of personal information they can possibly type into their computer-machines. Lazy terrorists, kidnappers, etc., hardly need to do recon with a camera. All they need to do is use Google street view and join a dating site. And don't get me started on the security cameras that are going up all over the place (including here in Toronto). People on both sides of the border rail against the government further encroaching into our lives, but then demand that very same government keep us safe from any and all harm that could possibly befall us. Consistency, people! (Please - all of this is meant in gentle jest).
Click to expand...
 
Chuck Albertson said:
Never apologize, never explain.
Click to expand...


That's one approach. I never apologize but I always explain. "Explaining" has led to many images I could not have gotten otherwise. Currently working on an inner-city urban project and almost always those who come up to me with the fiercest challenge turn out to be gentle as lambs. Put your "rights" as a photographer in your back pocket and talk to folks is my advice. Evoke your rights, and the law, only when absolutely necessary.
 
rdeleskie said:
Thank God I live in the great socialist, big government state of Canada. I've seen very little of this nonsense here in Toronto. Once, a PDO asked me to stop taking pictures of a film shoot. I was about to explain to him my rights, but decided it wasn't worth it. I walked around the corner, snapped my photo and that was it. On the weekends, I've seen amateurs walking around with big DSLRs dangling from their necks all over the city (and not just in touristy areas).

The problem you describe seems to be less "big brother" and more vigilante justice. I don't mean to slight my American friends (I'm half-American myself), but the news down there keeps people whipped into a constant state of anxiety (child abductions, terrorist attacks, illegal immigrants running across people's yards). Heck, even your president is a neo-Muslim-Marxist, non-citizen involved in a vast, decades longs conspiracy to...do something or other that's really bad. The irony of course is that people - North Americans in particular it seems - just love posting photos of themselves and their friends in all sorts of really compromising situations all over of the Internets, along with every scrap of personal information they can possibly type into their computer-machines. Lazy terrorists, kidnappers, etc., hardly need to do recon with a camera. All they need to do is use Google street view and join a dating site. And don't get me started on the security cameras that are going up all over the place (including here in Toronto). People on both sides of the border rail against the government further encroaching into our lives, but then demand that very same government keep us safe from any and all harm that could possibly befall us. Consistency, people! (Please - all of this is meant in gentle jest).
Click to expand...
YES! Excellent observation.
 
gb hill said:
I wish I had the money to visit Arizona. This statement shows you don't know what you are saying. The police are NOT rounding up illegals like the media is declaring They are only saying this to rile up voters on the left! If a police officer stops a suspicious person then he can ask for proof of residence!
Click to expand...
LOL. You mean suspicious as in taking snaps at a farmer's market? And how does a tourist provide proof of residence? Your sense of due process is exceeded only by your sense of humor.
 
fotomeow said:
I cant even take a picture of a tortilla truck w/out causing undue attention!
Today after I ate my tacos, I took a couple pics of the tortilla truck with my Minox 35 GL (small!! inconspicuous! quiet!) and the next thing I know the lady in the tortilla truck runs over to me with a cell phone saying something in Spanish ....I take her cell, "Can I help you?" I ask, "This is the owner, is there a problem? What are you doing taking pictures of my tortilla truck?"...
jeez, ; I mean, I realize maybe they are undocumented residents in CA, or he doesnt have a business license, but I used a discrete camera, and I was AWAY from the 2 people on the other side of a freakin' tortilla truck.
Click to expand...


Mmmm...tortilla truck food




 
Chuck Albertson said:
Never apologize, never explain.
Click to expand...

I strongly disagree with the latter. I carry a few of these in my bag. On the rare occasions when I've been bothered. I give them out. I politely explain that the law is quite clear, that I have a right to do what I am doing, and that the law trumps local or private rules.
 
Ken Shipman said:
LOL. You mean suspicious as in taking snaps at a farmer's market? And how does a tourist provide proof of residence? Your sense of due process is exceeded only by your sense of humor.
Click to expand...

I assume the Arizona bit was because of the recent immigration legislation! i don't see any other reason why you mentioned it.
As for a tourist...have you ever heard of a drivers license, passport, or ID card? My son can't drive a car because of seizers but had to get a ID card.
 
Keep in mind that the situation is complicated in the UK by the Police use of Section 44 of the Terrorism Act to stop photographers.

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/publications/home-office-circulars/circulars-2009/012-2009/

http://photographernotaterrorist.org/bust-card/

Also remember that the pocket knife they discover in your bag you use for trimming the film leader (and pulling stones from horses hooves) will be considered an offensive weapon and with a 'zero tolerance' approach certainly across London, you will be charged with possessing that if nothing else.
 
Odd, seems we have gone full circle: paranoia about being photographed leads to the taking of a "street" photo (albeit by cell phone) ..
 
We've hashed through this subject umpteen times here. This is what I've concluded:

1. Governments can ban photography on government property.

2. Owners of private property can stipulate that photography is not permitted.

3. if you are on public property and can see it, you can photograph it, even if "it" is on private property. (Although you might have a case on your hands if you point a 400mm lens into the window of, say, the local bank.)

4. People who do not want to be photographed do not care about the law or a photographer's rights.

I said private property owners can "stipulate" no photography rather than "ban" it because I suspect their power to ban photography varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

Legitimate rights to take pictures will not be preserved by complaining online, or, contrary to many assertions here, by simply exercising that right. Establishing the right to pursue photography is going to take lawsuits. Someone is going to have to go to court after being prevented from taking a photo, and hope that the case moves sufficiently far enough along the judicial food chain that an appellate court makes a ruling that sets precedence. The fact that many private property owners attempt to ban photography, but seem not to enforce that ban against cellphone users, while chasing down people holding actual cameras, seems to me an inconsistency that might be exploited. For example, either the local mall stops mom and pop from snapping cellphone pix of the kids, or it lets the guy with the SLR or the Leica shoot away, too.
 
there are several things to think about.

1) how to deal with paranoid members of the citizenry. should you try to educate them? how do you qualm their fears and diffuse the situation?
2) how to deal with rent-a-cops, who may be overstepping their boundaries. what is the best way to assert your rights? what really is the culture behind rent-a-cops?
3) how to deal with police officers. i guess you really have to know the law in this case!

is there an organization that helps photographers cope with this anti-photography culture?
 
aizan said:
there are several things to think about.

1) how to deal with paranoid members of the citizenry. should you try to educate them? how do you qualm their fears and diffuse the situation?
2) how to deal with rent-a-cops, who may be overstepping their boundaries. what is the best way to assert your rights? what really is the culture behind rent-a-cops?
3) how to deal with police officers. i guess you really have to know the law in this case!

is there an organization that helps photographers cope with this anti-photography culture?
Click to expand...

As I implied earlier, I don't think that's going to have much of an impact.

People who go ballistic about photography are very poor targets for education and persuasion. It's akin to road rage. When someone is trying to ram you with their pickup, that's not the time to talk to them about your right to be on the road.

Rent-a-cops do what they are told to do by the people who pay them. If the boss says stop people using cameras, that's what they will do.

Actual police are also paid to enforce the law.If they are told you can't take pictures, they will feel justified and obligated to keep you from taking pictures.

In all cases, people trying to stop you from taking pictures believe the law is on their side. The courts need to rule on the issue.
 
wgerrard said:
As I implied earlier, I don't think that's going to have much of an impact.

People who go ballistic about photography are very poor targets for education and persuasion. It's akin to road rage. When someone is trying to ram you with their pickup, that's not the time to talk to them about your right to be on the road.

Rent-a-cops do what they are told to do by the people who pay them. If the boss says stop people using cameras, that's what they will do.

Actual police are also paid to enforce the law.If they are told you can't take pictures, they will feel justified and obligated to keep you from taking pictures.

In all cases, people trying to stop you from taking pictures believe the law is on their side. The courts need to rule on the issue.
Click to expand...

Dear Bll,

THAT'S the time to be driving an old Land Rover Series III with tree-sliders on the sills...

Cheers,

R.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom