am I missing something with the cv skopar 21/4?

[Lss]

Works well with colour. On R-D1:

 

[jsrockit]

Here's a recent shot with the skopar:

He's skating "Mongo!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongo_foot

 

[ampguy]

I've got a minty black LTM one in the classifieds right now. If you don't want the finder and case, I'd probably go $350 for just the boxed lens. ad link

 

[anjoca76]

Unfortunately I don't have any examples on this computer to share, but I can tell you first-hand that this is an excellent lens. I bought it specifically to bring with me to Italy this summer, and although I'd also brought 4 other lenses with me, this one never left my camera, and the results were amazing, imo, especially its color rendering. You won't regret buying the 21/4. What I love most about it is that, despite being a wide-angle, it distorts so little that it can be used in so many "normal" circumstances too. Just be sure to keep your fingers out of the frame when composing your shots!!

 

[Ezzie]

Only piece of photographic equipment I regret selling. Compact, light, sharp enough and wonderful colour rendition. Maybe a bit more contrast than I normally prefer, but easily manageable.

 

[ampguy]

I've put a lower price on my CV 21/4 black LTM like new lens with box, finder, leather case, in the classifies here: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost-classifieds/showproduct.php?product=31703

 

[Richard G]

Lovely pictures Maggie.

I got the Zeiss because I was a little disappointed with the distortion and flare of the 25/4 compared with the Zeiss 25. I also wanted it for an architectural project and the absolute straightness was worth it to me. Looking at this thread I reckon I would have been happy with the 21/4 too.