I hear ya Al. If the printing on Earl's work was done well, it's likely they would bring some buyers. I think the copyright for unpublished work = date of the author's death + 70 years. So, there may be an issue (if I'm correct) with Uncle Earl's relatives and the current holder of the plates. Maybe they can work something out, if for nothing else than Uncle Earl's talent and memory. p.
It just dawned on me that the photos, via the plate holder's web site + the press coverage, could be said to be published. But they weren't published by the author or his agents (relatives). So, how does the law work on this? Any publications or intellectual property lawyers reading this thread? is it still death + 70?
p.