To me his talent was on the technical side. He is unsurpassed for making superior negatives and darkroom prints. Content... I'm not finding it very fascinating as content, but, again, quality of prints brings fascinating. I think, static objects, wide spaces were best match to reveal his technical genius. Is it interesting to look at it,as on the art? Honestly, I like more photos with people. And I like early Impressionism and Group of Seven for landscapes and mountains. This is the art to me. Good, super quality darkroom prints are also art, but technical kind of art. Something which is called as the craftsmanship.