Any experiences with a Jupiter-8-1?

A

alexbachin

Newbie
Local time
5:45 AM
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
10
I'm excited to get into FSU lenses and want to get a Jupiter-8. I'm deciding between trying to find a tabbed version circa 1960 or buying a new (old stock) Jupiter-8-1 from Fedka.

I haven't been able to find a lot about people's experiences with the newer '90s Jupiters. Does anyone have any information about them?
 
I have an 8-1. I don't like it as much as my 80's J-8. The images just aren't as nice. Also, the second aperture scale doesn't line up correctly.
 
My suggestion is to buy one from a member who has already used it and determined that its a goodie. I have tried exxxxy and other sources with LIMITED success.
 
This is with a 1980s J-8 that I just sold in the RFF classifieds:

Wide-Open
picture.php


Tight Crop:
picture.php


Wide-Open:
picture.php


picture.php


Tight Crop of above.
picture.php


This lens required adding 0.1mm to the shim, was back-focusing when I got it.

picture.php


Note: This one is from 1985, and is a J-8, NOT J-8-1.
 
Last edited:
I have a early black version of the J8, and I also have seen the Fedka NOS J8.
I ordered and received the Fedka NOS J8, but actually my old black J8 is much prettier with its white figures then the NOS one with its yellow/green/red figures, from this aesthetics I tend use the old one more.
There is no difference between the two, both perform the same to me.
Here's a test-picture from my old black J8 @ F4 taken with a Bessa-T, Sonnar all over :

4005361167_082d89f7e6_o.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fantastic images of what a J-8 lens, old or new can do. I love the Bokeh in your shots, Brian. They really show the beauty of the J-8 and remind me why I like that lens so much. I have 8 J-8s from 1957 to 1985 and all except the 72" and 57" ones are stellar performers. The 72' suffers from haze and the 57' is a little low in contrast but pretty sharp stopped down. You really can't beat a good J-8 or Helios 103 for their price to performance ratio. They really blow some more expensive brands out of the water when you make that comparison -Kievman
 
I just popped out half an hour ago to get some shots with my black Jupiter-8 (s/n 09092340) which came with a 1973 Zorki 4. Bright but overcast day, 11:00 BST. Camera = Lumix GF1

GF1BJ-8seedshome.jpg


GF1BJ-8treeshome.jpg
 
not only Fedka -90's J8-1's are sold as "NOS". also -80's J8's pop up in eBay and are sold as new-old stock, never used. seems, based on the comments here, -80's version has slightly better build but only marginally ?
 
I have a Jupiter 8 from 1961. It isn't the tabbed version but I can see the potential in the lens:

5792877774_d5a0e65d7b_b.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/5792877774/

I'm still working on shimming it correctly though. Its close but not as sharp as the Keiv J8s I used. This one was purchased from Fedka as Exc-. It has some very subtle cleaning marks but nothing I've seen causing problems.
 
Last edited:
I guess I have the early version, black, no tab, that wacky two sets of aperture scales. But the IQ is so damn unique that I can not part with it.
 
I had a 1964 J-8 (again, not tabbed) and I loved it. I gave it and the Zorki-4 that came with it to a good friend of mine and regretted it ever since. I need to start looking for another one soon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom