jan normandale
Film is the other way
heh, Sanders you've started quite the 'feeding frenzy' for Medalists !
;D
;D
heh, Sanders you've started quite the 'feeding frenzy' for Medalists !
;D
Frank, I'm impressed with the glass.. the camera seems so primitive/simple that I wouldn't have guessed these results were a Medalist.
I just got my Father-in-law's Kodak Medalist II back from a five-month, $400 stay with Ken Ruth. The 120 conversion and CLA is first class and well worth the wait and expense. I had shot a little 620 with it prior but with the CLA it is much nicer to focus. The magnified rangefinder is wonderful.
I'm real happy with the results, the bokeh, etc. I'm comparing this to Fuji 6x9s, Hasselblads, Rolleis, Mamiya 6s, roll film backs on 4x5s, and vintage folders... I think this camera is as good as any of them.
So far my only complaint is how it balances off the strap lugs.
Frank, I'm impressed with the glass.. the camera seems so primitive/simple that I wouldn't have guessed these results were a Medalist.
Hi Jan,
that would be me, the link is here.
I have sold my Medalist II since then because I kept grabbing the Horseman 970 to shoot 6x9, but seeing the shots from Medalists here regularly makes me doubt the wisdom of my decision...😱
Mine took five months, see prior post. Add a month for Canada-US Post ;-(
I'm about 10 rolls of 120 into my converted Medalist now and the image quality is great. However, at slower speeds, like 1/25-ish, boy does my sloppy technique hurt. The shutter release is stiff and I tend to rotate the camera when I press down, ruining a bunch of shots.
Now I know why Hasselblad and Rollei have you pull the release towards you....
Anyway I wasted enough film that I will be more careful and brace the camera from the bottom right more than usual from now on. When I shot 620 I only shot it outdoors but I was having fun with the ISO800 Portra in dim light.
It's a great camera but ergonomics is not its strong suit.