robklurfield
eclipse
one of my favorite shots from your archive!
One from my dad, 1938.
![]()
robklurfield
eclipse
Change is so much easier to recognize at a distance.
You only have to go to the 80's for things to start looking quite different. Once you get back to the 70's, it was much different world. I find it interesting you can tell which decade a lot of photo's from probably the 20's through the 80's were simply by how people were dressed, and how they wore their hair. How true is that today? I can't decide if I simply ignore such things now, or if there really has been that little change the last 20 years.
robklurfield
eclipse
"Leg of mutton sleeves?" Wow, there's so much knowledge on RFF.
Michael,
I think your date is spot on - the "leg of mutton" sleeves on the ladies dresses are classic late 1890s fashions (to be honest, they're the only fashion I can reliably date - I can guess others, but those sleeves are just too distinctive to miss).
Is it me, or do a number of the heads not quite match the bodies? If that is the case, I wonder if not everyone could get to the studio together, and the latecomers were photographed separately and pasted in? I've not previously seen it in family photos, but I've seen it in many sports team photos from the 1920s and 1930s.
I've got a number of scans of my great-grandfather's quarter-plate negs from around 1910, and also some print scans largely of country houses around 1910-1920, as well as a WW1 hospital and its inmates. However, I just don't think I have the time to put many up here - there were THIRTEEN albums of the latter, and I was pretty sick of them by the time I finished...
Adrian
[
robklurfield
eclipse
Bob, thanks.
That organizational skill of yours is no doubt a key difference between a rank amateur like myself and someone who earns a living at this. I'm embarrassed to admit that these negatives were "hiding" in plain sight almost right under my nose. In glassine sheets. Now everything is going to be labeled and filed safely.
My father had hundreds of rolls in shoe boxes. Hopefully he kept them out of the basement and still has them somewhere safe.
That organizational skill of yours is no doubt a key difference between a rank amateur like myself and someone who earns a living at this. I'm embarrassed to admit that these negatives were "hiding" in plain sight almost right under my nose. In glassine sheets. Now everything is going to be labeled and filed safely.
My father had hundreds of rolls in shoe boxes. Hopefully he kept them out of the basement and still has them somewhere safe.
Great to see the NY I lived in Rob. I was there 82 - 90.
I'd not have to do much digging to find negatives- all mine are filed in numerical order starting in 1980, those from before that are in a couple of boxes, though I do have a box of negatives from my grandparents house that I've not gotten to conserving yet.
robklurfield
eclipse
Keith, the way around this is for everyone like you, Michael Markey, charjohncarter, etc., etc. who has some ancient images they've unearthed to start a thread of their own. Perhaps if all stick the word "archival" or the word "archaeology" into the title, the thing will develop enough inertia to change Stephen's mind. If we can't do that, then maybe he's right. If we can do it, maybe he'll take notice.
As a matter of interest I PM'd Stephen last night politely asking about the possibility of a sub forum for these sorts of archival threads:
Disappointing response!![]()
tj01
Well-known
Thanks Rob for starting this thread. And the rest who are generous enough to open up their family archives. Much appreciated.
Here're some scans from my dad who shot all these with a Contaflex in 1963-1964 during his time in Europe. He said he shot all these with Kodachrome because he wanted to save a few pennies.
After the Contaflex was stolen, he stopped taking pictures. It was a gift from his father who he hardly saw. Sometimes I think I should hunt down a Contaflex for him again.
Here're some scans from my dad who shot all these with a Contaflex in 1963-1964 during his time in Europe. He said he shot all these with Kodachrome because he wanted to save a few pennies.
After the Contaflex was stolen, he stopped taking pictures. It was a gift from his father who he hardly saw. Sometimes I think I should hunt down a Contaflex for him again.
Attachments
Last edited:
atlcruiser
Part Yeti
One part of this I have really noticed in what both Rob and keith have done is the importance of the minor details. Many of these photographs are great as is but the window into the past, especially in some of the more mundane photos, really reinforces the beauty of photography for me.
thanks for the kick in the ass.....I have a very large box of jumbled negatives from 1985ish onward.....cant wait to dig in now
thanks for the kick in the ass.....I have a very large box of jumbled negatives from 1985ish onward.....cant wait to dig in now
charjohncarter
Veteran
Just barely out of the 80s, this 1990, Ensenada (Kodak Gold 100-2):


robklurfield
eclipse
John, great 1990's shot of a great 40's car.
charjohncarter
Veteran
John, great 1990's shot of a great 40's car.
A daily driver, that is not aparking place; a traffic jam.
charjohncarter
Veteran
So back to the 1980s as prescribed by Rob. Panama, 1989, remember Lockerby, I had to listen on my short wave:


Last edited:
robklurfield
eclipse
John, you certainly have traveled a great deal. Panama 1989? Were you rounding up Noriega?
Great images, these two.
Great images, these two.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.