Forest_rain
Well-known
I was thinking about using my Minolta x-370 for an upcoming project. It's not professional, but I want it to be good quality. I want to experiment with colored flash gels, and different lens filters for portraits.
However it seems like it would be difficult and "slower" doing this on a manual x-370. I've got a Minolta 600si, and it struck me that the flash functions better than vintage flashes, cycle time is better, you can take "more" pictures, focus and exposure will be more accurate. I can also use the flash off camera with a cable or wireless sync. I can also experiment with High Speed Sync at high shutter speeds.
I don't have to take the time to focus, fiddle with exposure, making the subject possibly nervous or losing the moment.
Don't get me wrong - I enjoy using my manual X-370 more. It's just more fun to use. I learn much more about photography from using it. It's more enjoyable "doing it by hand" rather than having the camera compute everything.
But is there a situation where you would get better "results" from a manual camera? I know sharpness isn't everything - older lenses are probably less sharp than newer ones with newer coatings. Sometimes I feel like manual focus lenses have more "character" because of the less perfect image or less consistency.
However when it comes to the finished product, perhaps the newer autofocus film slrs are better, even though they aren't very popular, and don't seem to sell much compared to vintage cameras. And they still achieve the film "look" that is desirable in many circumstances.
However it seems like it would be difficult and "slower" doing this on a manual x-370. I've got a Minolta 600si, and it struck me that the flash functions better than vintage flashes, cycle time is better, you can take "more" pictures, focus and exposure will be more accurate. I can also use the flash off camera with a cable or wireless sync. I can also experiment with High Speed Sync at high shutter speeds.
I don't have to take the time to focus, fiddle with exposure, making the subject possibly nervous or losing the moment.
Don't get me wrong - I enjoy using my manual X-370 more. It's just more fun to use. I learn much more about photography from using it. It's more enjoyable "doing it by hand" rather than having the camera compute everything.
But is there a situation where you would get better "results" from a manual camera? I know sharpness isn't everything - older lenses are probably less sharp than newer ones with newer coatings. Sometimes I feel like manual focus lenses have more "character" because of the less perfect image or less consistency.
However when it comes to the finished product, perhaps the newer autofocus film slrs are better, even though they aren't very popular, and don't seem to sell much compared to vintage cameras. And they still achieve the film "look" that is desirable in many circumstances.