surlysimon
Established
I was looking at buying an R3A but realised that maybe an R2 would suit me just as well, but i am not sure if they are still availible or will i have to look for a S/H one?
surlysimon said:I was looking at buying an R3A but realised that maybe an R2 would suit me just as well, but i am not sure if they are still availible or will i have to look for a S/H one?
Huck Finn said:The Rollei 35 RF is essentially a special edition of the R2 but with 40/50/80 frame lines. And the 40 frame lines are more viewable than on the R3A because of the lower 0.7 magnification. These are still available new.
Huck
Huck Finn said:but where are you going to get a CLA on a Bessa as the years go on?
Huck Finn said:The Leica tech I talked with said that he won't work on Bessas. Maybe that was just him. My point was just that as nice as mechanical cameras are, they have their limitations. One of them is that they need periodic adjustments to keep spring tensions properly adjusted so that shutter speeds are accurate. This is not the case with electronic shutters. I just have a question about whether anyone will be out there to service Bessas the way they are out there to service Leicas.
However, for anyone who prefers a mechanical camera, the R2 is still good value for the money.
Huck
Huck Finn...Why would you want to limit your lenses to 0.9 m because of the body on which they're mounted when they're designed with the capability of focusing down to 0.7 m? ... Huck[/QUOTE said:Two of my favorite CV lenses (Nokton 0/1.5, and the Ultron 35/1.7), show that they only focus to .9m. I'm rarely down at that end of things, anyway—even with the lenses that focus to .7m. I here what you're saying, though.
I picked up the R2 for the reason Stephanies stated, it's a good mechanical backup to my all electric cameras.
That said, I may be putting mine up for sale shortly. My M4-P has taken over the R2's role.
🙂
.
surlysimon said:The New R2 i bought today makes a little noise after the shutter has fired and i lift off the release button. is this normal or should i take it back? My R doesn't make the same sound
Huck Finn...Why would you want to limit your lenses to 0.9 m because of the body on which they're mounted when they're designed with the capability of focusing down to 0.7 m? ... Huck[/QUOTE said:Well, I for one like my M3's. I use lenses that focus to 0.7m on it. If I need something much closer, I'm likely to pull out the SLR. One of the M3's has been modified to focus closer than its original minimum distance, but the parallax comesation drops out at ~0.8m. The RF goes to 0.7. My Nikkor 5cm F1.4 in LTM goes down to 18", but that only works on the Nicca's.
RayPA said:At what speed do you here the noise?
ray