Chris101
summicronia
Nikon N80, F5, D100 and D70
Canon A1 (long gone)
Olympus OM-1n
Mamiya 645 and 645J
Canon A1 (long gone)
Olympus OM-1n
Mamiya 645 and 645J
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Both
Canon DSLRs (20D, 5D - for weddings/portraits)
Canon SLR (Elan 7 - for film)
Nikon FE (for the old school feel - first Nikon and I like what it can do)
Dave
Canon DSLRs (20D, 5D - for weddings/portraits)
Canon SLR (Elan 7 - for film)
Nikon FE (for the old school feel - first Nikon and I like what it can do)
Dave
Ming The Merciless
Established
I have never ever used a Canon or a Nikon SLR, I'm a Contax person. (Except when I'm a Bessa Person)
paragon
Established
Film
Nikon all the way - F to F3 - FA, F80 and F100
Canon, but stopped when lens compatibility stopped, post FD lenses
Digital
DSLR - definately PENTAX - IMHO price v performance Pentax beats Canon and Nikon - I have a K100D - but when I upgrade I would expect to continue with Pentax
P&S
Canon Power shot
Nikon all the way - F to F3 - FA, F80 and F100
Canon, but stopped when lens compatibility stopped, post FD lenses
Digital
DSLR - definately PENTAX - IMHO price v performance Pentax beats Canon and Nikon - I have a K100D - but when I upgrade I would expect to continue with Pentax
P&S
Canon Power shot
Lotari
Established
As I've been photographing for relatively short time, my first slr was a Canon 300D (it was the first affordable dslr). When my photography studies started three years ago, I adopted my father's old Pentax P30, and with it almost abandoned digital photography.. until I went all-Pentax system and sold Canon to my sister and got *ist D. That change brought joy back to digital shooting, and also meant that I had to get more K-mount lenses!
Nowadays if I'm not shooting with some older film machines, I have D in my hand with either old K35/2 or Sigma 24/1.8. Pentax is amazing system for a person with limited budget; for example, my set of three fast primes, K35/2, M50/1.4 and Helios-40 85/1.5, have costed a bit over 200 euros for me. And manual focus isn't problem with D's exceptionally good viewfinder and ground glass.
Nowadays if I'm not shooting with some older film machines, I have D in my hand with either old K35/2 or Sigma 24/1.8. Pentax is amazing system for a person with limited budget; for example, my set of three fast primes, K35/2, M50/1.4 and Helios-40 85/1.5, have costed a bit over 200 euros for me. And manual focus isn't problem with D's exceptionally good viewfinder and ground glass.
Thea
Established
Nikon all the way. SLRs, FM, the legendary F3 and F301 (The metering on these is second to none)
My F3 used to belong to a reporter friend who took it to India, Russia and covered both Iraqi wars - it looks like it too.
My dad always used Minolta's (the XGs and later Dynax) as his work horse, and so did I until I picked up the FM, and I was converted to Nikon. I am not a fan of autofocus - I dont like equipment that tries to tell me what to do!
However for work, I use a D80 and sometimes a D2X. The D80 is loads better than the D70, much more user friendly.
Having said that, I have a small pocket size canon Ixus, but dont think alot of it.
There's my 2p worth!
My F3 used to belong to a reporter friend who took it to India, Russia and covered both Iraqi wars - it looks like it too.
My dad always used Minolta's (the XGs and later Dynax) as his work horse, and so did I until I picked up the FM, and I was converted to Nikon. I am not a fan of autofocus - I dont like equipment that tries to tell me what to do!
However for work, I use a D80 and sometimes a D2X. The D80 is loads better than the D70, much more user friendly.
Having said that, I have a small pocket size canon Ixus, but dont think alot of it.
There's my 2p worth!
TheHub
Well-known
Nikon, but only because I've got a bunch of F-mount lenses. I started getting them to use on my S1 & S1 Pro. I've got a Nikon FM that I use them on sometimes.
I've never used a Canon SLR, but if I saw an old one cheap I might get it. I'm not into SLRs right now because they're loud and they have that hump in the middle for the prism. RFs have sexier bodies and can handheld down to 1/15 (by me, at least
)
I don't care who the maker is, as long as the camera works, the lens ain't junk and it takes good photos
I've never used a Canon SLR, but if I saw an old one cheap I might get it. I'm not into SLRs right now because they're loud and they have that hump in the middle for the prism. RFs have sexier bodies and can handheld down to 1/15 (by me, at least
I don't care who the maker is, as long as the camera works, the lens ain't junk and it takes good photos
Dr. Strangelove
Cobalt thorium G
I use M42 bodies. I have too many of them actually. Two Prakticas (LTL & Super TL2), Cosina 4000S (aka Vivitar 400/SL) , Mamiya DSX 1000 and GAF L-ES (rebranded Chinon CE Memotron) . Various lenses. No Pentax lenses though, since they are overpriced compared to for example Carl Zeiss Jena lenses. One of these days I will gave to get a Zenit so that I have a nuclear war proof cameraifirdauzi said:I use Canon EOS-3
I also have a Kiev 6C and a Kiev 60 medium format SLRs and a few lenses for them. Both actually work! Might get a Mamiya or Pentax MF SLR at some point. The prices of MF film cameras are falling rapidly now as the pros and rich amateurs are switching to digital MF or Canon 'full frame' DSLRs.
No Digital SLR at the moment, but I will probably get a Pentax at some point so that I can use my M42 lenses. I am not too excited about digital though and I use my fixed lens film rangefinders as much or more than my Nikon P&S digicam.
Now for the real issue: ifirdauzi, why do you have my picture as your avatar?
MatthewThompson
Well-known
Canon here. For film, I peaked with an EOS 1N/booster combo and some tasty glass. Now, it's whatever gets the job done.
kubilai
Established
Minolta über alles
Minolta über alles
I keep Minoltas bodies because of my MD 24mm/2,8 (less flare than my Elmarit ASPH) ; and love my MC "radioactive" 85mm/1.7 (but my late MD was superb)
Minolta über alles
I keep Minoltas bodies because of my MD 24mm/2,8 (less flare than my Elmarit ASPH) ; and love my MC "radioactive" 85mm/1.7 (but my late MD was superb)
spiderfrank
just a dreamer
I started to shoot in 1990, with a Ricoh KR 10-d , then in 1999 I bought a Canon EOS 300 (called Rebel in USA), and in 2001 an EOS 33V (Elan 7 in USA), that's a fantastic camera, and I'm happy with it.
In 2003 I found a nice used OM-10, it was pretty and cheap, and I bought it, to have someting "manual", and that's my other SRL... Sometime I enjoy to use it, but the EOS is my baby...
Other SRL: a big and ugly Kiev 60 TTL: that's my monster...
Franco
In 2003 I found a nice used OM-10, it was pretty and cheap, and I bought it, to have someting "manual", and that's my other SRL... Sometime I enjoy to use it, but the EOS is my baby...
Other SRL: a big and ugly Kiev 60 TTL: that's my monster...
Franco
ltketch
Established
Minolta XD7
Minolta XG9
Praktica Super TL
Minolta XG9
Praktica Super TL
topoxforddoc
Established
Leica R9 & DMR plus my old Pentax MX for a backup
Charlie
Charlie
Roger Vadim
Well-known
Nikon...
2 FE's, 1 Fe2, 1 FM, 1 Nikkormat EL... too many bodys sometimes, but its sooo convenient to have a wide range of film loaded in 5 cameras
(and I couldnt resist buiing some of them just because they were black...) all lighter than the F series and ultra reliable - never any problems with them
All my Pro friends here in Berlin allthough got Canon d5's, (with all kind of lenses, from their old hasselblad Planars to nikons and the L's of course) and this is a neat little camera! if i'd go digital than with a canon - because i can meter all my precious ai(s) glass with the canon - and not with the 'cheaper' nikons... i am really very unsatisfied about that brand policy...
at the moment shooting with a kiev4 ... beautyfull soft glass, charming and cool.
michael
2 FE's, 1 Fe2, 1 FM, 1 Nikkormat EL... too many bodys sometimes, but its sooo convenient to have a wide range of film loaded in 5 cameras
All my Pro friends here in Berlin allthough got Canon d5's, (with all kind of lenses, from their old hasselblad Planars to nikons and the L's of course) and this is a neat little camera! if i'd go digital than with a canon - because i can meter all my precious ai(s) glass with the canon - and not with the 'cheaper' nikons... i am really very unsatisfied about that brand policy...
at the moment shooting with a kiev4 ... beautyfull soft glass, charming and cool.
michael
Jouvet
Member
Nikon
3 FM2n, 1 FM3a...and some primes
3 FM2n, 1 FM3a...and some primes
W
wlewisiii
Guest
Added another Canon to the tribe today - my A2E arrrived. Nice little beastie even if it is an AF camera
Still, it looks to be much fun to play with - especially the eye controlled focus.
William
William
wray
Well-known
Nikon N80 and Nikon D80
TheHub
Well-known
I've only used Nikon & Pentax. A K-1000 was my camera through college (along with a Rollei 35 that I didn't know how to use at the time.) I've got some F-mount lenses left over from my dSLR days that I use on a Nikon FM sometimes.
mn4367
Established
Nikon F3 since I was 17. At the age of 39 I bought an Epson R-D1 and I think I'll never go back to (D)SLR.
Although IMO the F3 is the best 35mm SLR ever made. No love affair but a tool. And one of the rare tools which are perfect and timeless.
Although IMO the F3 is the best 35mm SLR ever made. No love affair but a tool. And one of the rare tools which are perfect and timeless.
Joop van Heijgen
Established
I use for more than 30 years, besides my M Leica cameras the Leicaflex SL and Leicaflex SL 2 !
The Leicaflex cameras are mechanical cameras with the same build quality like the M Leica. The viewfinders of the Leicaflex cameras are the best ever made for a SLR!
The Leicaflex cameras are mechanical cameras with the same build quality like the M Leica. The viewfinders of the Leicaflex cameras are the best ever made for a SLR!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.